Wilso wrote:The neighbours no longer take holidays due to the fact that they can longer leave their homes unattended for more than 24 hours. For many, sleep is a thing of the past.
<grins>
I really don't have much of a problem with the choice you made, so - <wave of the hand> -
but still, couldnt help noticing that that's quite an intense acquaintance you seem to have made with those neighbours on your 5-minute visit!
<grins again>
ok, err, since you brought up the Q yourself -
a) noone'll take offence at your decision to leave the option be after seeing the state of (some) of the street
b) some of us (me, for one) wouldn't really be bothered either if you hadnt bought the property simply cause you'd rather not live in a street full of Aborigines (Q of feeling at home, and all that)
c) the crux is, as I think you sensed yourself (as otherwise you wouldnt have opened this thread), in the extent to which a whole string of assumptions is immediately made, as in this quote (unless I misunderstood and you did spend some time talking with the various neighbours there).
Now, you may well be right about it being a rotten neighbourhood, considering the amount of houses for sale, and even about the Aborigines in Q having made it more of a mess. In the end, I'm sure, that's anywhere between a reasonable risk assessment and mere prejudice - and honestly, none of us (except for a fellow-Aussie perhaps) will be able to tell which of the two it is more. For sure nobody will mind that you werent eager to play guinea pig to see whether it wasnt indeed just prejudice. But still - that a first impression - some boarded up houses, messy yards, and some Aborigines - instinctively triggers such vividly imagined assumptions about the various terrors the White neighbours must be living under, must be a bit uneasy.
Always interesting to catch ourselves at our instinctive reactions in confrontations with the Other ...