1
   

Fat vs. Calories

 
 
Reply Tue 17 Aug, 2004 12:35 pm
If you took in a bunch of calories in one day, but none of them are from fat, would you gain weight? I have heard that this is not true, that your body can convert any type of molecule into fat. How is this possible? Can your body actually change a molecule of, say, sugar, into a fat molecule? If this is the case, why are nutritionists always supporting low-fat, and not simply low-calorie diets? Thanks!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 760 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Aug, 2004 12:40 pm
Well, calories count, regardless of source. Now, carbohydrates (including sugar) are worth about 4 calories per gram. Fat is worth about 9 calories per gram. So far as I know, carbs have nothing to do with heart and vascular problems. Fats do. Also, some carbohydrates are in the form of fiber, which does not digest to sugar.

Go with moderation.
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Aug, 2004 12:48 pm
Of course you could gain weight, if you took in more calories than you expended. See, that's it, really, it's calories. Calories are a unit of heat. If you take in fewer than you burn, you lose weight - so you can lose weight either through dieting or exercise. If you take in more calories than you burn (either through overeating or by being sedentary), you gain weight.

Where fat comes into the picture is threefold:
(1) fat tends to not contain much else, so you tend to not get vitamins, fiber, etc. when you ingest fat. So you're taking in calories but aren't garnering any benefits other than being able to burn stuff. Since you need to intake Vitamin C, etc., anyway, you are intaking those calories plus the calories from other items, such as fats.
(2) fat requires far fewer calories to metabolize. That is, to convert it to either energy or, if you've got enough energy for your needs, fat. So if you intake an equal amount of calories from fat or from protein, you end up with fewer usable calories from the protein simply because the Krebs cycle in your body needs more fuel in order to store the protein than it does the fat.
(3) anything can be converted into fat, although sugar is the least likely because it tends to be converted directly to brain fuel. This isn't to say that pure sugar won't make you fat - it will (and it will rot your teeth and may contribute to acne and make your blood sugar rise and fall very quickly, which can be a problem if you are hypoglycemic or diabetic) - but sugar first heads to the brain. But most of us eat too much of just about everything, so even excess sugars end up as fat. And once it's converted to fat, it's fat, regardless of the original source of the calories.

One other thing - building muscle is helpful not only because the same amount of muscle poundage is more densely-packed than the same amount of fat poundage (e. g. you can fit into a smaller size), but also because maintaining muscle mass requires some calories. So when your body % skews higher towards the muscle end, you need more calories to maintain your body weight. Therefore, you can intake more calories without gaining weight.

Here's a site that talks about calories and weight: http://www.wvda.org/calcs/
0 Replies
 
evelyncanarvon
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Aug, 2004 12:51 pm
Thank you both very much for your prompt responses! Very Happy If I ever have any important questions I'll know to come here!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Fat vs. Calories
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 12:57:55