Karzak wrote:Rick d'Israeli wrote:I did not say I know all answers.
No, I said it for you, just like it was said for me.
If you guys want to stop posting substance, and post this crap then I will play right along. At least for a while.
So what's the game Karzak? You don't actually have anything to say? I'm looking through all of your posts on this thread and you've commented on a number of things that others have said, but you haven't really brought anything new to the discussion.
Why are you 'playing right along' when you could be actively contributing? Most of the people on this site are easily swayed by well-supported arguments.
Do you have a point of view or is it just the opposite of whatever a 'liberal' says?
Here are your contributions to this thread:
karzak wrote:1 - LOL, we are researching stem cells. Who's the ninny now?
2 - LOL, no, I am not excepting you.
Stem cell research has not been reduced under Bush, it continues. If someone can prove that harvesting stem cells from human beings against their will is proper, then we can redress it. For now, however, the proper course is the current one, to wait and see if stem cells actually can do some good.
3 - And you are completely in error. Please try to stick with the facts, OK?
All the stem cell lines currently active can still be employed in federal research, hence there is no reduction in stem cell research.
4 - Like Kerry?
5 - LOL, nothing on topic to say?
6 - You still have not shown any reduction in stem cell research. Can you address this point or not?
7 - Again, show where Bush has reduced the stem cell research. All I see is whining by some researchers about not being able to increase the research on the taxpayers bill.
8 - LOL, I like the way you lable people who don't agree with you a "troll", no doubt you think the motherland needs some cleansing.
You are wrong in your assertion, existing research can continue, it has not been reduced. New frankenstinian manipulation of humans to get new stem cells using public money is all that has been curtailed. Private research is uneffected.
9 - LOL, more lables, how very progressive you are
Disgust at people who trade in human lives for money doesn't equal fear, but I'm sure that goes over your head.
Nazi Germany, they were very left wing, like you.
LOL, you think I'm special, you wanna kiss me....
When you can get back on topic feel free, if all you want to do is continue with assinine labels and misdirection, well, I'm sure you think it reflects highly on you
10 - What qualifies anyone to determine that stem cell research shouldn't be shelved and the money spent on some other project?
Stem cell research is still going on, with public funds, it wasn't eliminated or even reduced by Bush, and most of the people complaining are either the ABB crowd who complain and blame Bush if the sky is too blue, and the people who are hoping for more public money to go their way.
11 - Hardly, it's more like taking grandmas dead carcass and using it as a doorstop. Heck, why not?
12 - Nothing complex about ethics.
13 - Hey, using a dead grandma as a doorstop could lead to important findings as well, give me a big government grant, a few dead grandma's, and 20 years and I'll prove it... Or not.
14 - Yes, you tell him that. If he is smart enough he will agree.
15 - Political discussion. What's yours?
16 - So you don't discuss here? You should leave then
LOL, So I am a happy guy, I guess the libs hate happy guys?
17 - Ah, another guy with all the answers! I'm confused, dis this mean you are leaving as well?
18 - No, I said it for you, just like it was said for me.
If you guys want to stop posting substance, and post this crap then I will play right along. At least for a while.
