unconditional with limitations

If this were a grammar question or a logic question, I'd say it's either meaningless or inappropriate use.

The long and short of it is this:
Unconditional means ...without limitations.

So, if I were you, I'd be happy that he's says romantic things to you...but understand that such words are without substance - especially with both of you also still in other relationships.

Words mean little without being backed up with actions--which have real meaning. The reality is that both of you get out of those bad relationships and clear up your baggage. Then you can start listening and watching the meaningful actions.

Canast's lover's statement sounds like a total contradiction.

Such are the ways of lust..err I mean love

How about "I love you unconditionally, but I don't want to be with you - I want to be with my wife"


Those saying it's a contradiction haven't thought about how you can love family members unconditionally (so to speak) without wanting to be with them (obvious, but used in a comparative sense to the 'it's a contradiction' statement), without loaning them money every time they ask, etc.