@onevoice,
http://able2know.org/topic/305632-1
Here's his thread about "assholes" being shown the door.
There is another one which I believe was entitled "A2K Sucks" in which he laid out some of his plans for change. You should be able to find it under the "Popular" tab.
As was pointed out, Robert is the creator of this site. He is also the owner which is of great significance because as the owner, he makes the rules.
As far as I know this has always been a free site, and while I seem to recall adverts at one time, there haven't been any for a long time. I don't believe Robert makes any money on A2K (or if he does it's minimal and mysterious - for me), but he has other internet projects/products that apparently do pay the bills for his business and himself. He has said that A2K is a hobby and his favorite web endeavor, and overall, I think the majority here will agree that he is, essentially, a benign ruler; often an absentee owner.
When and while he is disengaged from A2K (presumably working on other projects) the site generally suffers. He is far too left-wing for me to ever nominate him for A2K's Top Poster
, but he's among the most interesting. But it isn't the absence of interesting topics or comments that causes A2K to suffer during a Robert hiatus, it's the unchecked growth of chaos.
In general free speech has been an important underpinning of the forum's operation, as well as the concept of control through user policing. He introduced a number of features intended, in part, to allow users to address behaviors and content they felt was offensive or simply not interesting, like the "thumbs up & down" and "ignore." They are differing opinions about the utility of these features, but I think it's safe to say they haven't been wildly successful in terms of their intended effect.
For whatever reason, Robert has returned to A2K recently and announced plans for what seem to be rather significant changes. He has already implemented a more aggressive approach to moderating content and behavior. Whether this is merely temporary until other interests demand his attention, remains to be seen. There are "moderators" here other than Robert, but my sense is that when he is absent, the moderators tend to become more passive. That may be because he wishes to be involved in final decisions, or without him available for consultation, the moderators feel less empowered. This is just speculation on my part, the moderation process is not laid out in TOS. Some people here may know the identities of the moderators (other than the moderators themselves of course), but I don't. I believe they are also users of the forum and thus perhaps they have reservations about using tools like a suspension as respects other users. Again, speculation. I certainly would
not say that there is a band of brown shirted moderators governing A2K with cattle prods and cat-o-nine-tails.
This may be more than you asked for, but here it is.