What will your reaction be if you are suspended?

So cute, that you think 28 views means 28 different people viewing the thread. It's probably mostly you looking at the thread, desperately waiting for a flame war reply 20+ times.

Are you that desperate for attention that you're checking the view numbers every hour since you posted this egotistical thread? Are you trying to set yourself up as some kind of a2k Christ martyr for the rest of the conservatives on this board?

There's a long time pattern of responses to looks ratio with the variations that some threads are more answered than others within that patterning, just the way the ball bounces.
I'm the one that thumbed the thread up immediately, both for the thread and then for the opening post. I didn't respond, not being in a talky mood. I looked a bit later and there you were scolding people.

I know, I was making a joke based upon what Bill wrote. Tsarspan didn't get it but thought it cute to reply with a "yawn"

On the matter of hawkeye, he's one of the people I had on semi-ignore. That is, if I see a user ignored (view) thing on, say, a cooking thread, I'll view, and I'd gladly talk with hawkeye, or anyone else, there. If I don't want to see mass of posts by a person of volatility on a variety of issues, I coast on by, in his case, having read him for years prior.

On the matter of being suspended, me, if I were suspended, I'd have a hard time. A2k is a part of my life I don't want to lose.

I don't think you have to worry about being suspended.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Kind of like the 29 who have viewed this thread and the 28 who haven't commented?

Within a few minutes of putting up a post, webcrawlers from Google, Bing, et al will hit the page, adding to the hits numbers.

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Yes, for using "fag" as a slur.

That wasn't the only reason. How about the Hawkeye's posts about degradation of women and his desire to slam( etc) the heads of women against stone walls ( as an example). And on, and on, and on.

But then, we have other males who love to use the C-word when degrading women or use the K-word when attempting to degrade Jewish individuals...etc

Miller wrote:

Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Yes, for using "fag" as a slur.

That wasn't the only reason. How about the Hawkeye's posts about degradation of women and his desire to slam( etc) the heads of women against stone walls ( as an example). And on, and on, and on.

But then, we have other males who love to use the C-word when degrading women or use the K-word when attempting to degrade Jewish individuals...etc

If my memory serves me correct, the "K" word was once directed to a non-Jew. I'm assuming it was pejorative to be thought of in that manner, when one is a non-Jew and would not like anyone to think otherwise. Or, it could be the start of a loving diminutive for the term "Jewish"? By the way, the "K" word supposedly originated in Ellis Island, when Jewish immigrants in the late 19th century couldn't sign their names, and would not make an "X" instead, since it was too much like a "cross." So, they were asked to make a circle instead. The circle being a "chicle" (gutteral "ch" like in the correct pronunciation of Chanukkah). So, the non-Jewish civil servants used that word to describe Jews, but with a "hard" "ch" (K sound). In effect, Jews were the people of the "circle." to the English speaking Americans.

Right! While the man, who's using the C-word in an attempt to degrade women was still here

while that form of suspension had it's appeals, i preferred getting away with what ever transgression would have led to such a result

Olly, is that you?

Only recently has there been a hubub about suspensions, and I think by their notable absence we can all figure out who has suffered the cut.