Dear Olie, I see you are now into what I call stubborn evasiveness, with your text:
From Susmariosep: "all that is in existence, it is put there by some entity."
Or several entities, more often. Like in the case of the elephant I was talking about.
You know, dear Olie, I am thinking all the time about a thread on Autopsy of Impasses, right now I have you and Brian for protagonists, with me one side and you two on the other side.
The purpose of the proposed thread is to examine how impasse occurs, by examining the cognitive psychology of the protagonists.
Right now I have the idea that impasse occurs when humans use words with their insistence that the words they use are understood by them in their own way, and they have the natural right to understand words in their own meanings of the words in concern.
What do you say about that?
Nevermind, let us you and me talk about the elephant you mention above, namely: "...several entities, more often. Like in the case of the elephant
I was talking about."
Tell me where previously you brought in elephant, so that I will know what for you is the definition of the word, elephant.
Dear readers here, let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness what other words Olie will bring in, to replace my phrase in bold: "all that is in existence, it is put there by some entity
That phrase, some entity, is chosen by me precisely for all protagonists to specify what they want to mean with the phrase from me, some entity
You see readers, if my opponent protagonists want to refer to the creator cause of everything with a beginning, then it is all right with me, except that I have to explain to readers that by elephant Olie means also what I mean with the phrase, some entity, namely, the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
That is typical of atheists' speech, because they have this taboo and phobia of the thought/concept of creator cause of everything with a beginning.
Take notice that they also use words like: flying spaghetti monster, invisible pink unicorn, tooth fairy, Santa, etc., all of them of course with people who do read and think on the cognitive psychology of atheists, they refer to what theists understand, like one theist Susmariosep, the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
So, dear Olie, what are you referring to with your elephant, in place of my some entity.
For your notice, Dear Olie, by some entity I am talking about God in concept as first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.
No more, please, of evasiveness, and also please don't dwell in flippancies, because you will lapse into profanities, and that is the end of civility with you in a web forum.