1
   

DNC, no war discussion?

 
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 09:48 am
Carbon
Don't let the door hit you on the ass on the way out.
0 Replies
 
CarbonSystem
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 09:51 am
The doors are automatic.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 09:54 am
CarbonSystem wrote:
Yes, but the thing is, he is preventing an american massacre. You would be singing a very different tune if Iraq had launched an attack on us and we hadn't gone in to search.


No he isn't.

There is no evidence that Iraq could have or even disired to launch an attack on us. The fact is that 1,000 Americans have died in Iraq because of the war.

Are you upset becuase we haven't attacked Peru, or Nigeria. These countries pose just as much of a threat as Iraq did (except Nigeria has Uranium).

You may say this is ridiculous now, but you will be singing a very different tune when Peru launches an attack on us and we hadn't gone to search.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 09:54 am
Whether or not the majority of Americans vote for Bush remains to be seen Smile

In a recent poll, when asked who they'd rather "hang out" with, the overwhelming majority picked President Bush. Edwards was a distant second, Kerry third and Cheney only got 4% LOL.

I like Cheney Smile I'm also aware that I'm probably the only American who does, so save your flames.

Carbon, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 09:58 am
Peru and nigeria don't have a history of supporting terrorists or terrorism. They also do not hold a grudge against the west or the US. Your comparison is vacuous.

Had you brought up Iran or N. Korea, then maybe you could have had a point.
0 Replies
 
CarbonSystem
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 10:00 am
ebrown_p wrote:
CarbonSystem wrote:
Yes, but the thing is, he is preventing an american massacre. You would be singing a very different tune if Iraq had launched an attack on us and we hadn't gone in to search.


No he isn't.

There is no evidence that Iraq could have or even disired to launch an attack on us. The fact is that 1,000 Americans have died in Iraq because of the war.

Are you upset becuase we haven't attacked Peru, or Nigeria. These countries pose just as much of a threat as Iraq did (except Nigeria has Uranium).

You may say this is ridiculous now, but you will be singing a very different tune when Peru launches an attack on us and we hadn't gone to search.


I am just curious, has Peru been reported to have been making chemical warfare? I do not think so. True there has been no evidence in Iraq but why would there be, they knew we were coming. Also, does Peru have a leader like Iraq's former leader Saddam Heuissen? (sorry bout the spelling) Comparing Iraq to Peru is a naive and bold statement.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 01:30 pm
Hm, well the comparison may have been unfortunate, but ebrown's main response to your argument (the one saying that Bush is "preventing an American massacre" by waging the Iraq war) still stands:

"There is no evidence that Iraq could have or even disired to launch an attack on us."

Meanwhile, ebrown is also right, "The fact is that 1,000 Americans have died in Iraq because of the war."
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 01:40 pm
Almost right. The media here generally still refers to it as an invasion, not a war.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 07:22:36