Reply Sun 11 Oct, 2015 05:09 pm
I don't understand the use of "would" here. This is conversation.

A : What is the difference between God and deity?
B : God would be considered a deity, but a deity can refer to any God-like figure regardless of religion.

A : How does "all-knowing" work?
B : All-knowing would refer to one person and this person's knowledge encompases everything.

Can you explain the use "would" as in "would be considered" and "would refer to"?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 5,141 • Replies: 1
No top replies

Reply Tue 4 Sep, 2018 08:32 pm
When we talk about things doubtful, or things theoretical, we often use 'would' in such discussions. 'would' is also used by a speaker to be less direct/know it all/softer/even more polite.

These, "would be considered" and "would refer to" would be the same in meaning as saying

God is considered a deity ... . // All-knowing is a reference to one person ... .
0 Replies

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
  1. Forums
  2. » would
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 11:42:09