Lightwizard wrote:Sorry to dissapoint you -- as you can tell I've been around here too long.
30 seconds was 30 seconds too long!
LW writes
Quote:You have proof of the shredding in Whitewater, of course.
Only the testimony of one aide. However it took Bush and the coalition less time to rout the Taliban, capture Saddam Hussein and install an initial democratically inclined government in Iraq than it took Hillary Clinton to locate those Rose Law Firm billing records that mysteriously appeared on her coffee table one day.
Well, it took some time to have the old billing letterhead reproduced, and she was busy with other things
http://www.papersourceonline.com/deaths.htm
But hey I think McG has found a new niche: A2K post translator. I need to get to him a few others that completely mystified me. Of course, I mystify just about everybody.
Wow that was quite a digression
And Ken Starr is in on it too.
After all his hard work, Starr couldn't get one Whitewater connected indictment on either of his prey, er, the subjects of his investigation?
Why, that's smacks of some kind of plot to me!
We must petition somebody to re-re-re-re-investigate all these Whitewater matters, because it matters so much. We must start by arresting Ken Starr and forcing him to confess that he could have, wanted to, shoulda hada woulda coulda but didn't because .........
he was having an affair with
Sorry, there's someone at the door.
Joe
I hate to press on, but since he/she either is :
A)skirting the issue.
B)ignoring what I´ve asked of him .
I must ask again:
@Karzak
Just to be completely clear on the subject:
You can't explain it?
Whitewater will be EXTREMELY important should Hitlary ever find herself running for the head office.
All those skeletons in her closet will help tie the noose around her campaign...
McGentrix wrote:Whitewater will be EXTREMELY important should Hitlary ever find herself running for the head office.
All those skeletons in her closet will help tie the noose around her campaign...
Oh yeah American will be ready to travel down the well worn out path again!
Hey, if the last four years haven't taught you anything, it definately shows that a checkered past and questionable leadership never kept ANYONE from being elected.
Cycloptichorn
Ok one last shot , maybe his/her eyesight is not that good:
@Karzak
Just to be completely clear on the subject:
You can't explain it?
Quiet, he's busy emulating Bela Lugosi with indigestion.
Lightwizard wrote:Quiet, he's busy emulating Bela Lugosi with indigestion.
Nope, I just ignore people who try to put restraints on my answers. Not worth my time.
I wouldn't be talking about restraints if I were you.
I just want to focus on the topic about which you commented on , but since you stated that you are ignoring it , I must come to the conclusion that you can´t explain it.
If this is not the case please elaborate , on the topic which I asked you about , otherwise simply state I can´t explain it because I don´t want to.
..or you can make as the president and walk out when asked a question.
