1
   

261/27-year-old

 
 
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 07:41 pm
(1) 261/27-year-old? I could not figure out what number it is.

The Securities and Exchange Commission will bring related civil charges against Lay, according to sources who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing 261/27-year-old investigation.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 883 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 08:31 pm
I also find that paragraph confusing.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 10:43 pm
Here is the article:

Quote:
Former Enron CEO Lay To Face Criminal Charges
Federal prosecutors could announce indictment against collapsed energy giant's chief Thursday, sources say.

Former Enron CEO to Face Criminal Charges

By Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 7, 2004; 5:27 PM

A federal grand jury in Houston issued a sealed indictment against former Enron Corp. chief executive Kenneth L. Lay on Wednesday, and prosecutors are set to make the criminal charges public Thursday.


Lay, 62, who has been under intense scrutiny since Enron filed for bankruptcy in December 2001, issued a statement after news reports of the charges. "I have been advised that I have been indicted," he said. "I have done nothing wrong and the indictment is not justified."

In recent months, the grand jury has heard evidence from a series of former employees who said they alerted Lay to mounting financial problems in the months before the company disclosed phony earnings and billions in hidden debt. Lay, who founded Enron and served as its longtime chairman, took over again as chief executive in August 2001, after the sudden resignation of his handpicked successor, Jeffrey K. Skilling.

The Lay indictment marks a major development in the government's most prominent investigation into corporate fraud after the Internet bubble burst in 2000. Skilling, who replaced Lay as chief executive for six months, was indicted earlier this year.

(JB: Take precaution: the case -- the Internet bubble was rooted in the US and shocked the rest of the world afterwards. China, as one of the victims of the bubble burst, has been having to face music since then!)

The exact charges against Lay remained under seal Wednesday, but other former leaders at the company have been accused of fraud, conspiracy and insider trading offenses.

Lay said he will surrender to authorities Thursday morning. He is expected to appear at a brief court proceeding before a magistrate judge in Houston later in the day.

The Securities and Exchange Commission will bring related civil charges against Lay, according to sources who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the ongoing 261/27-year-old investigation.

Investigators have probed a series of optimistic statements Lay made to analysts and employees in the months before Enron's fall, which cost thousands of workers their jobs and retirement savings. Lay also sold millions of dollars of Enron stock back to the company between August and December 2001, using a revolving line of credit as an "ATM machine," in the words of one former board member.

Lay has strongly denied wrongdoing through his lawyer Michael Ramsey, who told The Washington Post last month that Lay had been duped by underlings and that he sold stock only to cover losses in volatile technology investments. Moreover, Ramsey said, Lay held on to a substantial amount of Enron shares as the stock price dropped, losing potential profit in the process.

"We are very conversant with all the facts and all the documents," Ramsey said June 19. "I've seen nothing that will support a prosecution."

Prosecutors, who are barred from talking about pending charges, declined comment.

Skilling, a brilliant, abrasive former consultant, was indicted on 35 fraud and insider-trading charges in February. The government says Skilling presided over a wide-ranging conspiracy that employed accounting maneuvers, false statements and other methods to prop up Enron's stock price in the years before it collapsed.
(FYI: abrasive - Harsh and rough in manner.)

Legal experts said the trial could be among the most complex business schemes ever to be presented to a jury. Unlike the case of former Enron finance chief Andrew S. Fastow, who allegedly pocketed more than $60 million in company money without the board's knowledge, many of the accounting and legal issues reviewed by Skilling and Lay were vetted by outside experts. That could make it more difficult for prosecutors to convince a jury that the executives acted with intent to defraud.

So far the Justice Department's Enron Task Force has charged 30 people connected to the company with conspiracy and other crimes. Eleven individuals have pleaded guilty or been found guilty after trial. Among prosecutors' key cooperating witnesses on the Enron case are Fastow, former treasurer Ben F. Glisan Jr., and former corporate secretary Paula H. Rieker. All three pleaded guilty.

During Enron's heyday, when the firm reported revenue that ranked it seventh on the Fortune 500 list of publicly traded companies, Lay traveled the world to meet with power brokers and charity leaders. And he cultivated close ties to the Bush administration. President Bush nicknamed him "Kenny Boy."

More than anyone else, Lay was responsible for creating a vast energy company with operations that spanned the globe. Now that empire is a shell of its former self. The turnaround experts at Enron's helm are negotiating to sell its biggest assets and to return to creditors about 20 cents on the dollar in cash and stock in an international enterprise. A federal judge in New York is considering a plan that would allow the company to emerge from bankruptcy protection.

© 2004 The Washington Post Company
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 06:07 am
I think it's a typo and is meant to be 26 1/2 - 27 year old.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 06:31 am
Jespah, you might be right, but has the Enron investigation really being going on for more than a quarter century?
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 06:48 am
Prolly not. I bet they also mean months and not years. Hmmn, poor quality control on the part of the editorial staff!
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 07:08 am
i suspect that the serial number for the investigation is 261/27, since there is a dash between that number, and 'year-old, but the whole thing is confusing, at best. (And the investigation has been under way for three years +/-!)
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 08:42 am
From the morning newspaper: Enron was founded in 1982.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 09:06 am
So 26 1/2 27-year-old investigation seems unlikely.
26 1/2 27-month-old? Bizarre! Razz
0 Replies
 
Piffka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 09:28 am
That same staff writer, on Sunday, June 20, 2004, wrote:

Quote:

Federal prosecutors are preparing to seek criminal charges against former Enron Corp. chairman Kenneth L. Lay, capping a 2 1/2-year-old investigation into the collapse of the Houston energy company, said sources involved the probe.


So I think that is a major typo with a "6" and a "7" added in, possibly because of some sort of printing quality control count. Remove the "6" and "7" and then the phrase reads "2 1/2"-year-old investigation.
0 Replies
 
jespah
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 09:42 am
Ah, that makes a lot more sense, P.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 12:59 pm
Thanks, Piffka.
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 01:30 pm
Lovely. If the Washington Post has good "autopsy" readers (staff who checks today's paper in search of errors), some editor is going to be suspended.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 05:49 pm
I've also read "The charges come 2½ years after the U.S. Justice Department began an investigation which has slowly climbed the corporate ladder to bring criminal charges against 22 former Enron employees." in USAToday.com.

Piffka might have hit the nail on the head in the correction of the number. But how could you imagine such weird typo could occur in the world, ladies and gentlemen? Piffka said "possibly because of some sort of printing quality control count". Still, we'd like to know what mysterious printing quality control would cause this.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 06:02 pm
It seems like one of those things where when you have ' in the original article, and when you cut and paste, they appear as ?

Maybe HTML code for / is 6/7 or something like that?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 261/27-year-old
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 05:04:20