1
   

The fat cats who bankroll the demmunist party

 
 
swolf
 
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 06:46 pm
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/mm20040707.shtml

http://www.townhall.com/graphics1/columnists/malkin.gif

Just your average Democrat donors
Michelle Malkin


Quote:

The self-proclaimed Party of the Little People is rolling in cash, and Democrats are positively gloating. "The strength of the small donor has helped level the financial playing field with the Bush campaign," Mary Beth Cahill, Sen. John Kerry's campaign manager, crowed last week.

Just who are these "small donors" -- these ordinary Americans, these average Joes and Janes, filling the Democratic Party's coffers?

They are regular folks such as Beth Dozoretz, Washington doyenne and suspected facilitator of the infamous Marc Rich pardon under the Clinton administration, and Bernie Schwartz, former CEO of the disgraced Loral Corp., which paid $20 million in fines for its too-cozy relations with China that apparently endangered national security under the Clinton administration. This year, for their prodigious giving habits, Dozoretz was designated a Democratic National Committee "trustee" and Schwartz was named a DNC "patriot."

(The Democrats, by the way, insisted on concealing the names of these "trustees" and "patriots" until the Washington Post shamed them into disclosing their identities.)

They are joined by typical donors such as Rick Yi, an Asian-American businessman and former Kerry fund-raising vice chairman who passed the plate to his girlfriend (whose immigrant status and donor eligibility were immediately suspicious) and to old pals such as Chun Jae Yong, the recently arrested son of a disgraced former South Korean president. Yong faces charges of tax evasion on $14 million in inheritance money. While the Kerry campaign has returned Yong's money, both Kerry and the Democratic Party have held on to an estimated $500,000 in Yi-raised funding.

And then there are common Democrat givers such as Connie Milstein. She is just like you and me. If you happen to be the pampered heir to a multibillion-dollar real estate fortune in New York City. Milstein calls herself "an ordinary Park Avenue matron." Really. She is just your usual elbow-rubbing, partisan fundraiser/philanthropist/business mogul next door.

During the 1999-2000 election cycle alone, Milstein contributed at least $932,515 to various Democratic party soft money accounts, and spread another $40,000 in hard money donations to various candidates and political committees. In the fall of 2000, Milstein did what any regular Democrat donor would do: She flew herself to Milwaukee and bribed homeless people to vote for Al Gore in exchange for cigarettes. Milstein was caught on video by local ABC affiliate WISN-TV toting bags of cancer sticks for vagrants outside the Milwaukee Rescue Mission.

Then chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee's Major Supporters Committee, Milstein told the TV station she was an official representative of the Gore campaign and "was asked to come down and ring doorbells, go to shelters, see if I can get as many people as I could out to the polls."

It was just your run-of-the-mill campaign to smoke out (er, get out) the vote. Honest.

Wisconsin outlaws the procurement of votes with gifts worth more than $1. It's a felony. But what average Democrat donor lets a little thing like illegality get in the way? Milstein received a flimsy slap on the wrist and a puny $5,000 civil fine. Big whoop. She probably drops that much in one afternoon at Cristophe's (he's the high-priced barber of other ordinary Democrat folks with ordinary hair such as John Kerry-Heinz and Bill Clinton).

After the smokes-for-votes debacle, Milstein went right back to raising money for the Party of the Little People. And the party gladly accepted. In 2001, Milstein -- known campaign finance con artist -- gave $50,000 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC). In 2002, Milstein donated $100,000 to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), $50,000 to the DCCC, and $10,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC). In 2003, she donated $25,000 to the DNC and another $25,000 to the DCCC, in addition to $19,000 in hard money donations to congressional and presidential candidates, including Howard Dean, Joe Lieberman and John Kerry. In 2004, Milstein has given at least $4,000 to the Friends of Hillary and $1,000 to the DCCC.

So, let us hail the diversity of everyday Democrat donors: The pardon-pushing socialite. The Communist-coddling corporate sellout. The reckless Asian-American rainmaker. And the nicotine-stained heiress/almost-felon who keeps on giving.

It's a bankroll that looks like America. Really.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,083 • Replies: 30
No top replies

 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Jul, 2004 08:06 pm
Oh my God! This blows the GOP scandals all to hell! I guess we all better vote Republican and elect Bush to another four years!

Not in this life Charlie.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 04:49 am
Nick, don't feed the troll . . . if we're lucky, he'll go away . . .
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 08:33 am
NickFun wrote:
Oh my God! This blows the GOP scandals all to hell!


What GOP scandals?
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 09:21 am
swolf wrote:
What GOP scandals?


Laughing

(Although, I would say Nick should have said "Administration scandals" instead...)
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 01:58 pm
I don't really hear an answer anywhere.

Did you mean like Gov. Schwarzenegger's so-called "groping scandals" which the LA Times had 20 more reporters looking into than it did looking into the UN oil4food scandals which were literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry children and stuffing they money into the pockets of Jake Shellac and his ilk?

Or did you mean some sort of a supposed money scandal involving Haliburton? Haliburton of course is taking up slack created by Clinton's decimation of our militay, i.e. is doing work which the military used to do for itself. That's dangerous work and, of course, any theoretical overcharges would not begin to compare with Slick's pulling a trillion dollars out of the American economy for the benefit of his LIPPO buddies (Grand Staircase) or selling thermonuclear secrets off to the chicoms for campaign cash. I mean, even Judas Iscariat's selling Christ out looks good compared to that.

Other kinds of Slick scandals such as porking teenage interns on government facilities during working hours or waging dog-wagging wars are simply missing in the Bush admin, i.e. they simply don't exist.


Again, the question: what GOP scandals? What did you have in mind?
0 Replies
 
Redheat
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 02:20 pm
What exactly is the "demmunist" party? Confused

I mean do you really want to compare Democrat contributors to say OBL's family? or Enron who gouged CA and laughed about old ladies dying of heart attacks? Do you really want to go there?
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 02:29 pm
Swolf obviously never had an experience with a communist party. I grew up under one's rule. The 'demmunist' metaphore is, ehm, how to put this and stay polite... well, let's just say it is not very wise or informed.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 02:32 pm
You shouldn't judge people by their education or intelligence, dagmaraka!
0 Replies
 
JustanObserver
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 02:34 pm
swolf wrote:
I don't really hear an answer anywhere.


Thats because your posts have been so far off the deep end with hatred that your not taken seriously anymore (at least by me). You've become a parody.

By the way, when it comes to the Clintons, its safe to say you are officially:

http://ludicrosity.net/files/gaudin/owned.jpg

The tank is Clinton... your the tosser (european slang pun intended Razz )
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 02:58 pm
i'm not judging anyone. just saying the metaphore makes no sense.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 03:09 pm
And I forgot adding the :wink:

(Certainly the metaphore makes no sense at all!)
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 03:11 pm
Smile
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 03:12 pm
Most of the extrem right are neither wise or informed, swolf is a classic troll.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 03:13 pm
Well, I'd say no extremists are wise or informed - no matter what shape and form. It is a blind faith that makes them what they are...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 03:15 pm
Faith? Misbelief it is.
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 04:13 pm
dagmaraka wrote:
Swolf obviously never had an experience with a communist party.


True, nonetheless I speak Russian well enough to have asked a lot of people who have about it. In particular, when speaking with people whose parents lived under the tsars, I've always asked the same question, i.e. was life worse under the tsars or under the commies (zhizn buila xhuzhe pod tsaryami ili pod kommunistami? or some such), and the answer always comes back the same way, i.e. that life under the tsars was so bad that it seemed inconceivable at the time that it could get worse but that, after ten or twelve years of life under the commies, people were referring to tsarist times as the good old days.
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 04:48 pm
swolf wrote:
the answer always comes back the same way, i.e. that life under the tsars was so bad that it seemed inconceivable at the time that it could get worse but that, after ten or twelve years of life under the commies, people were referring to tsarist times as the good old days.


Basically, anybody who thinks he's got a problem with Bush and the neocons, is in for the same experience if the dems should win...
0 Replies
 
Adrian
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 04:52 pm
I hate to feed trolls, but, swolf, if I may ask. How many 100+ year old Russians do you know?
0 Replies
 
the reincarnation of suzy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jul, 2004 06:28 pm
Surprise, Swolf! We're not all poor, and some of us are rich! Yes, there really are rich people who believe in democracy! Thanks for the opportunity to educate you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The fat cats who bankroll the demmunist party
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/20/2024 at 12:32:37