1
   

Dubya’s Disorderly Daughters

 
 
Reply Sun 4 Jul, 2004 12:15 pm
I guess if Bush is going to use his daughters in his relection campaign, we could comment on how shallow and arrogant they are; like father, like daughters? ---BBB

Sunday Herald - 04 July 2004
Dubya's Disorderly Daughters

The US presidential election in November may well be decided by what voters think of the character of each candidate … and their family. That fact may not help George W Bush at the polls, reckons Lawrence Donegan in California

IN 1998, when Governor George W Bush of Texas was weighing up whether to run for the White House he received a memo from long-time aide Doug Weed that addressed one of his biggest concerns about his ambition to become President: the impact it might have on his teenage twin daughters, Jenna and Barbara. Despite Bush's fears, Weed enthused that it would be a "great adventure", adding they could "come out of the campaign with poise and knowledge of life beyond their years".

Fun-loving Jenna and Barbara Bush's time as First Daughters has indeed been a great adventure, though perhaps not in the way Weed had envisaged.

The miscreant presidential offspring is a long and dishonourable tradition in American politics stretching all the way back to Alice Roosevelt, daughter of Teddy, a self-confessed "wild child" of whom her father once said: "I can either run the country or I can control Alice. I cannot possibly do both."

Teddy Roosevelt's paternal dilemma is echoed in today's White House. The result has been unflattering headlines, such "Jenna and Tonic" (on the occasion of Jenna's first under-age drinking citation), and late night chatshow jokes, like Jay Leno's re-christening the president's rowdier daughter Jenna "Anheuser" Bush (a reference to Anheuser-Busch, brewers of famous US beers including Budweiser) in the aftermath of her second under-age drinking escapade.

Recently there has been a marked increase in the press coverage of the First Daughters. Last month Jenna and Barbara Bush graduated from university - Jenna from the University of Texas, where she had been studying English literature; and Barbara from Yale, her father's alma mater, where she earned a degree in humanities. The occasion was marked by a family dinner at the Moonshine restaurant in downtown Austin, Texas, and a spate of newspaper stories about the girls' future plans.

As usual, not all of the attention was welcome. Yet, even as sections of the press were told to back off, the Bush family was privately helping with two flattering magazine profiles of the twins - in People magazine and in Time - which pronounced them "hot". Soon there will be a photo-spread in Vogue and a profile in Vanity Fair, two of the most sought-after magazine slots for any marketing campaign intent on making an impression with the American public.

This kind of double standard is hardly new. Politicians, particularly so-called "family values" politicians like George W Bush, have always sought to exploit their families for political ends. With an election on the horizon, the presence of two "hot" young daughters by the President's side is unlikely to harm his image - at least not with the male, sports bar-frequenting constituency.

First Lady Laura Bush has even suggested that Barbara and Jenna might be persuaded to speak publicly in support of their father, in stark contrast to the 2000 election, when the twins were conspicuously absent from the campaign trail. Mainly because they couldn't stand his politics, according to one oft-repeated rumour. (A New York gossip column claimed last year that when Barbara was asked if she was a Republican voter she "rolled her eyes and made a funny face, saying, ?'I wouldn't really label myself that'." Jenna had reportedly had her own political disagreements with dad, most notably on his support for the death penalty.)

It is a truism to say that the 2004 US presidential election will be close. The result could turn on a tiny number of voters in a single state, or on a miniscule change in the voters' perceptions of George W Bush and John Kerry. In a tight race, the family lives of the candidates matter, and nowhere is this more appreciated than on the outer fringes of Republican Party circles.

It is here, among the zealous right-wing weblogs and gossip-peddling websites, that John Kerry's wife, Theresa Heinz, recently became the target of countless smears and slurs about the state of her marriage and her financial affairs - an unedifying campaign that led to her partial withdrawal from the political front line and the unprecedented publication of her tax returns.

Next in line for vilification were Alexandra and Vanessa, Kerry's two daughters by his first marriage. As well as being engaged in their father's political career, the Kerrys have their own high-flying jobs - Vanessa as a trainee doctor, Alexandra as a film-maker and actress - and blameless personal lives. However, it didn't take long before these innocuous biographies were distilled into political poison.

In the case of Vanessa, her offence was to appear in ads for her father and to be outspoken on a number of political issues - as if a 27-year-old woman had no right to be interested in politics. Alexandra Kerry's treatment has been even more outrageous. Her crime was choosing to work in the "liberal" Hollywood film industry - an offence she compounded by turning up at this year's Cannes film festival in a dress that turned out to be translucent under camera flashlights. The right-wing smear gleefully seized on the resulting photographs as evidence that the elder Kerry daughter was some kind of pornographic slut.

Set against this nasty and negative portrayal of Kerry's daughters, the White House's attempt to reinvent the Bush twins as the perfect embodiment of wholesome American values makes perfect political sense. If only this portrayal were rooted in more than the wishful thinking of the President's campaign managers.

Last year, to little fanfare and few sales, Washington Post journalist Ann Gerhart published a biography of the First Lady. The Perfect Wife: The Life And Choices Of Laura Bush was innocuous in almost every way but for a devastating chapter which dealt with the lives and recent times of Barbara and Jenna Bush.

"They are girls born rich, blessed with intelligence, good looks, trust funds, loving parents, boundless opportunities, freedom from many of life's daily challenges," Gerhart wrote. "Yet they persist in seeing themselves as victims of daddy's job … they have not appeared to engage in any of the pressing issues their generation will inherit, nor shown empathy for the struggles facing their mother and their father, the president of the United States."

Gerhart drew the comparison with Chelsea Clinton, who had used her father's time in the White House to immerse herself in politics, asking for tickets to State of the Unions speeches and joining her mother on tours of Africa and India. She cultivated the support and protection of her secret service minders, who repaid the respect she showed them by keeping her teenage shenanigans out of the newspapers. In contrast, the Bush twins were more interested in tickets for fashion shows and taking free trips - to the South of France to party with Sean "P Diddy" Coombs, and to Hollywood to hang out with actor Ashton Kucher.

Unlike Chelsea Clinton, the Bush girls treated their minders as hired help, rather than government agents who were prepared to take a bullet for them. In 2001, after Jenna Bush had failed to persuade a barman to illegally serve her alcohol she turned on a secret service agent who was there and told him: "You know, if anything happened to me, my dad would have your ass." Barbara, too, ran foul of her secret service agents on numerous occasions, mostly infamously when she slipped out of their protective ring to attend a World Wrestling Federation event in New York. On September 11, 2001, as the secret service scrambled to round up President Bush's relatives it took them hours to track down the twins. Given this fractious relationship it is hardly surprising that over the past three-and-a-half years a few examples of the twin's boorish behaviour have somehow leaked into the American media.

Far more elusive has been details of their parents' reaction to such escapades, or indeed if any presidential punishment was handed out. For her part, Laura Bush has responded, in public at least, with bland declarations of love. "I think, like every parent, if your children are happy, then parents are happy. And if they're unhappy, then there's nothing more difficult for parents."

Her husband was slightly more revealing. "I love them a lot. I am impatient with them," he told Ladies' Home Journal. "I have got to allow them to become the bright young ladies they're becoming at their own pace, and not at mine."

Spoken like a doting father - though it would be too much to expect that the more rapacious elements within the re-elect Bush campaign will apply the same leniency and understanding to the family of John Kerry.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 4,253 • Replies: 53
No top replies

 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jul, 2004 12:22 pm
Irrelevant crap is irrelevant crap. Doesn't matter who tries to use it.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jul, 2004 12:34 pm
Who cares?
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 08:08 pm
This is an example of partisan politics at its worse.
0 Replies
 
tony2481
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 08:38 pm
I'm sure just about every one of us here got into some mischief in our years, even if we never got caught. Hell I am sure even John (HRS) Kerry's daughters got into some fun in their youger days. News of the First Ofspring is nothing more than entertainment. Would you hold the president responsible for the actions of his children any more than hold them accountable for the actions of him? They are adults and they can do what ever they want.

They paid their fines and did their community service, where your savior, Bill Clinton, pardoned his misfit friends and family. Now which president's actions do you find proper? Nevermind his family!!
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 09:10 pm
tony2481 wrote:
I'm sure just about every one of us here got into some mischief in our years, even if we never got caught. Hell I am sure even John (HRS) Kerry's daughters got into some fun in their youger days. News of the First Ofspring is nothing more than entertainment. Would you hold the president responsible for the actions of his children any more than hold them accountable for the actions of him? They are adults and they can do what ever they want.

They paid their fines and did their community service, where your savior, Bill Clinton, pardoned his misfit friends and family. Now which president's actions do you find proper? Nevermind his family!!


Didn't one of Kerry's daughters show up at a Paris fashion show in a sheer blouse that exposed her assets quite nicely?

Of course this has zero bearing on whether or not her father is qualified to be president of the United States.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jul, 2004 09:17 pm
If an errant offspring was being paid a great deal of money for working on the campaign, then the erring might be news. Otherwise, the press is being manipulated by a muckraking puppetmaster.

Unfortunately, the American Public slavers over gossip about Those in High Places.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2004 11:29 am
I searched the forum but found no mention of this:

http://www.bartcop.com/jenna-tongue.jpg

With Limpbag having called the Chelsea Clinton the "White House dog", and more recent comments about Alexandra Kerry's "ooky" breasts as revealed by the camera lights at the Cannes Film Festival, it seems perhaps fitting that the Presidential Princesses of bad behavior manage to set themselves up for a little ridicule.

My opinion?

At least Jenna's behavior is improving...

http://www.bartcop.com/jenna-bday.jpg
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2004 11:55 am
Bush might be better off hitting the campaign trail without the twins. Very Happy

My grandmother used to say, "The apple doesn't fall far from the tree".
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2004 12:43 pm
Actually hearing that the twins are not that wild about their dad's politics and seeing jenna ? stick her tongue out like any other kid makes me feel about them. If they were stuck up they would be tedious.

My daughter just turned 21 today and she is going to florida with some of her friends, I sure hope no one takes pictures of them. (I also hope that she don't get drunk and naked..)
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2004 01:32 pm
Or maybe you would hope that the media and political opportunists would allow for some youthful indiscretion or even serious mistakes and wouldn't smear them all over the internet and message boards.

Kerry's daughter went 'exposed' to a prominant social function obviously intending to get some publicity out of it. We had fun with it, but we weren't as mean as this.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Jul, 2004 05:28 pm
I personally feel that the kids of politicians should be off limits even if there are used for campaigning, so this one time I won't argue with you about this being mean. It is mean.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:30 am
bump
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:34 am
revel wrote:
I personally feel that the kids of politicians should be off limits even if there are used for campaigning, so this one time I won't argue with you about this being mean. It is mean.


Agreed.

No good reason for a bump either, IMO.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:37 am
sozobe wrote:
revel wrote:
I personally feel that the kids of politicians should be off limits even if there are used for campaigning, so this one time I won't argue with you about this being mean. It is mean.


Agreed.

No good reason for a bump either, IMO.


You obviously missed the point.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:40 am
Quite possibly.

What is it?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 09:48 am
revel wrote:
I personally feel that the kids of politicians should be off limits even if there are used for campaigning


I've always been a bit puzzled how the media or the opposing camp found it necessary to involve the family of the respective candidate in order to judge the candidate. Same goes for politicians in general. As long as they don't get their extended family hired for a million-dollar counselling contract or something along those lines, they should indeed be off limits.
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 10:01 am
sozobe wrote:
Quite possibly.

What is it?


There are three current threads posted re: Ted Kennedy's kid minor traffic incident.
0 Replies
 
CoastalRat
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 10:04 am
Ted Kennedy's kid is an elected official. Bush's daughters are not. Seems his conduct is fair game. (Although I will grant you that 3 threads is a bit of overkill.....but I wonder how many were started about Cheney's hunting incident.)
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 May, 2006 10:42 am
Serious question Rox...

When are you going to run for office so you can show everyone how it's all supposed to be done?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dubya’s Disorderly Daughters
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/25/2026 at 04:20:25