Polar ice advancing, global warming is dead

@Ionus,

Your mother should have spanked you more, cause you still poo-poo all over.

I'm perfectly aware that scientific theories are always provisional, until proven false. Not just the cutting edge part but all of it. I'm a big fan of Popper. Still, science is the best tool we found to understand the way the world works. It builds upon trial and error.

My point, which apparently you missed, is that this applies to your pseudo-science as well, and a fortiori. YOU can also be wrong and truth be told, you are very often wrong. Learn a little humility before you try and teach it to others.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

Still, science is the best tool we found to understand the way the world works. It builds upon trial and error.

No argument there .

Quote:

My point, which apparently you missed, is that this applies to your pseudo-science as well

What psuedo-science would that be ? You mean not following every trend like a lemming ? THAT IS SCIENCE ! Scepticism and science are partners .

Quote:

YOU can also be wrong and truth be told, you are very often wrong. Learn a little humility before you try and teach it to others.

I can be wrong but it is not often . When convinced I will admit error . As for learning humility, is this from the same person who had such an arrogant defence of his country that he made many mistakes and admitted none ?

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Quote:

What psuedo-science would that be ?

When you say things like "Because all this Global Warming rubbish is by the same 200 scientists", that's pseudo-science borrowed from FAUX News and other disinformation outfits. There are in fact thousands of scientists working and publishing on GW.

Quote:

I can be wrong but it is not often .

So science is always wrong but you are not. Amusing.

Quote:

When convinced I will admit error . As for learning humility, is this from the same person who had such an arrogant defence of his country that he made many mistakes and admitted none ?

So when it was proven to you beyond reasonable doubt that Exocet never published an add in The Economist during the Falklands war, or that Chirac never ever even TRIED to "let the producers of the movie 'The Da Vinci Code' film in the Louvre if they made his niece the star ", did you come clean and say you were wrong?

No, you didn't, because you are not intellectually honest.

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

O.K. Aquaponics makes arable land less necessary. What about living in more temperate weather, so less oil/gas is needed to keep warm in the winter. Meaning northern countries would want more southernly land if there was a mini-ice-age, I would think. Anyway, what were you alluding to with the title of this thread?

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

There are in fact thousands of scientists working and publishing on GW.

There are about 30,000 actual Climate scientists . 200 account for the vast majority of papers published . They are prolific .

Quote:

So science is always wrong but you are not. Amusing.

Thats because I stick to well established science and demand PROOF before converting to a fad . Something you would be well advised to do, rather than being a fashionista .

Save the rest of your bullshit for the appropriate thread .

3 Replies

@Ionus,

Ionus wrote:

There are about 30,000 actual Climate scientists . 200 account for the vast majority of papers published . They are prolific .

So these 200 published 12,000 peer reviewed reports between 1991 and 2012? Good job!

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Ionus wrote:

There are about 30,000 actual Climate scientists . 200 account for the vast majority of papers published . They are prolific .

Ridiculous. You can't be a scientist and not publish nowadays. You have no idea what you're talking about.

Quote:

I stick to well established science and demand PROOF before converting to a fad

There is no such thing as a positive proof for any scientific theory. The only thing you can prove 100% is that a theory or hypothesis is FALSE. You don't know **** about science.

Quote:

Save the rest of your bullshit for the appropriate thread .

LOL. YOU started with it here in your previous post, and now that I take you up with it, you're running away with your nose bloodied.

Run little Yoyo, run. You're not only a compulsive liar, you are a coward as well.

2 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

There is more than that you are unaware of .

1 Reply

@Ionus,

Most certainly a lot - I'm not from Weisenheim like you.

1 Reply

@Foofie,

The title of the thread indicates that when you have ice advancing/increasing at BOTH poles at the same time, that the planet is obviously cooling and not warming, and that the only people you'll see still talking about warming are ideologues and super losers like formerman and Hinkey here.

2 Replies

@gungasnake,

Quote:

super losers

So hows your science denial life workin out for you?
Making a good living NOT finding any oil or NOT curing any diseases by denying evolution theory?. At least Im not an idiot like you.

Reading Fox news and believing its true can get tiring cant it.?

Hey I hear they need some self paying volunteers to go help look for Noahs Ark.

0 Replies

@Walter Hinteler,

I tell you the majority and you repeat that I said all . Not good on your part, is it ?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303480304579578462813553136

Quote:

In 2010, William R. Love Anderegg, then a student at Stanford University, used Google Scholar to identify the views of the most prolific writers on climate change. His findings were published in Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences. Mr. Love Anderegg found that 97% to 98% of the 200 most prolific writers on climate change believe "anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for 'most' of the 'unequivocal' warming." There was no mention of how dangerous this climate change might be; and, of course, 200 researchers out of the thousands who have contributed to the climate science debate is not evidence of consensus.

1 Reply

@Olivier5,

Quote:

There is no such thing as a positive proof for any scientific theory.

Tell Gomer ! Tell him about Evolution .

For those who want to see an arrogant cowardly lying french fool get trashed, read the following . I would say he got his arse whipped by that might excite him .
http://able2know.org/topic/274450-1#post-5935803

You are just trying to trash this thread so little Gomers drunken oversights will be hidden . He likes to visit the barn late at night but I think he draws the line at frenchmen .

The french are experts at cowardice, arrogance, surrendering, attempted bullying, contempt for any English speaking peoples because they save their rotten swine yard of a country all the time, cheese eating and wine drinking . What a lazy fat arse country you have there, scum .

3 Replies

@Ionus,

Quote:

Tell Gomer ! Tell him about Evolution

You are a lying sack of **** ANUS. Ever since I caught you in your T rex DNA BS, youve been trying to lie to yourself that it ws you who introduced me to the subject.

Youre delusional, you know that?

1 Reply

@Ionus,

The thing that really fucks with French brains and minds is eating snails. I mean, I'd eat a crow before I ever ate a snail...

http://ih.constantcontact.com/fs051/1105007507350/img/319.gif?a=1109940972767

2 Replies

@gungasnake,

Paella is a Spanish dish. In Britain, importers and farmers can't keep up with demand, in Germany they are called since the Medieval Ages "Swabian Oysters" ...

0 Replies

If for some perverted reason I WAS going to eat a snail, I'd cook it for at least 72 hours before I ate it, I mean, either that or put it in one of the buildings at Fukushima for a day or two first....

1 Reply

@gungasnake,

You should do it like it was done in biblical days. Or use any of the traditional recipes of the later periods, when snail became a lent dish.
But some really like it done the gourmet-fashion of today, like you did.

0 Replies

@gungasnake,

A cooler planet might be good for using less electricity in the summers? Isn't most electricity generated by burning fossil fuels? Plus developing nations can then produce more winter clothes that are more expensive than summer wear. As the song goes, there's a silver lining in every cloud.

0 Replies

@Ionus,

Quote:

Mr. Love Anderegg found that 97% to 98% of the 200 most prolific writers on climate change believe "anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for 'most' of the 'unequivocal' warming."

And from that, you concluded that:

Quote:

Ionus wrote:
There are about 30,000 actual Climate scientists . 200 account for the vast majority of papers published .

Let me see if I get this right: If these 200 most prolific writers happen to believe they each have one nose, it then follows that they account for the vast majority of papers published on the number of noses human beings have? :-))

2 Replies

Polar ice advancing, global warming is dead

Quick Links

My Account

able2know