1
   

Petite skull reopens human ancestry debate

 
 
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 06:17 pm
Petite skull reopens human ancestry debate
18:47 01 July 04
NewScientist.com news service

The remnants of a remarkably petite skull belonging to one of the first human ancestors to walk on two legs have revealed the great physical diversity among these prehistoric populations.

But whether the species Homo erectus, meaning "upright man", should be reclassified into several distinct species remains controversial.

Richard Potts, from the National Museum of Natural History at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington, DC, and colleagues discovered numerous pieces of a single skull in the Olorgesailie valley, in southern Kenya, between June and August 2003.

The bones found suggest the skull is that of a young adult Homo erectus who inhabited the lush mountainside some 930,000 years ago. The prominent brow and temporal bone resemble other Homo erectus specimens found elsewhere in Africa, and in Europe, Indonesia and China.

But the skull itself is around 30% smaller, which is likely to have corresponded to a similar difference in body size. The specimen helps fill a gap in the fossil record as very few Homo erectus specimens of this age have been found in Africa so far.

Strong arm

Many stone tools of similar age to the skull fragments have been found at the same site, and Potts' team suspect these may have required considerably more strength to manufacture than the small Homo erectus probably possessed. If so, this would imply a considerable physical variation within the local population.

Some experts even go so far as to suggest that a complete rethink of the human genealogical tree may be in order. "Recognising that Homo erectus may be more a historical accident than a biological reality might lead to a better understanding of those fossils whose morphology clearly exceeds the bounds of individual variation," says Jeffrey Schwartz of Pittsburgh University.

But Fred Spoor, at University College London, UK, disputes this interpretation, saying there is probably similar variation among modern human populations and ape species. "It's completely justified to call it Homo erectus," he told New Scientist. "This just gives some insight into the great variation of later specimens."

Spoor notes that the paucity of the fossil record means that many conjectures about Homo erectus remain unproven.

He hypothesises that a Homo erectus of this size may in fact have been muscular enough to make the stone tools found in the Olorgesailie valley. "They may have been small individuals, but incredibly powerful," he says.

Journal reference Science (vol 305, p 75)
Will Knight
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,032 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 10:51 pm
I don't think one finding proves anything about the human species.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 11:14 pm
I wouldn't mind a little head.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 11:36 pm
Bill, Need an ashtray for your cigar smoking, heh?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Jul, 2004 05:29 am
No sir, thanks for asking. Midnight will be 3 weeks!
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Jul, 2004 05:45 am
youre gonna need a new pic Bill. Now that youre smoke free


Since our ancestors and cousins all lived on an erosion suface, the lack of fossils is not a mystery. A simple rule in developmental taxonomy (stuff that keeps guys like eO Wilson employed) is that the greatest diversity in species and varieties always occurs at the area of origin. the fact that were only now finding more species in context of their layers of sediment, is more testimony to the fact that there are a gazillion paleontologists out there now.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Jul, 2004 06:19 am
farmerman wrote:
youre gonna need a new pic Bill. Now that youre smoke free


Since our ancestors and cousins all lived on an erosion suface, the lack of fossils is not a mystery. A simple rule in developmental taxonomy (stuff that keeps guys like eO Wilson employed) is that the greatest diversity in species and varieties always occurs at the area of origin. the fact that were only now finding more species in context of their layers of sediment, is more testimony to the fact that there are a gazillion paleontologists out there now.
And even so, they've only found a tiny fraction of the species who've lived on this planet. Heck, they've only identified about 10% of the species that are alive today (which is only perhaps 1% of the total)!

Then you've got the mistakes that can be made from a single example like the skeleton form La Chapelle-aux-Saints. They thought they had found a typical young, healthy Neanderthal manÂ… when in reality, they had found this:













http://www.able2know.com/forums/images/avatars/653434828407f35e383d9c.jpg
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Nov, 2004 01:36 am
Quote:
The battle for the Hobbit: professor stuns world of science by locking it up
By Steve Connor, Science Editor
30 November 2004


She may have only been a midget but her bones have generated a huge row in the world of human palaeontology, already reeling from the dramatic implications of her discovery.

All the experts who have studied her tiny skull and skeleton believe the "hobbit woman" found on a remote Indonesian island represents a new human species that only died out in recent history. However, a maverick scientist disputes this interpretation, saying she was just another member of our own species but with a congenital dwarfism disease.

Now, Professor Teuku Jacob of Gadjah Mada University in Indonesia has taken the matter into his own hands by locking her remains away in his personal vaults, making it difficult for other scientists to gain access.

Anthropologists fear that scientists outside Indonesia could be prevented from studying the remains of what they are convinced is a dwarf species of human, named Homo floresiensis after the island of Flores where it lived until at least 11,000BC.

Professor Jacob insists the remains are those of an anatomically modern human - Homo sapiens - with a congenital disease, and he has angered fellow anthropologists by requisitioning the remains of Flores woman for his research purposes. Under a private agreement with a fellow anthropologist, but without the apparent permission or knowledge of senior archaeologists in Indonesia, Professor Jacob has locked the bones away in his private vaults at his university in Yogyakarta.

Australian and Indonesian scientists last month revealed a new species of dwarf human who grew about 3ft tall and lived 13,000 years ago. It was described as one of the most significant finds in human palaeontology since the first Neanderthal skull was found 150 years ago.

However, Professor Jacob then threw cold water on the claims by arguing that the grapefruit-sized skull belonged to an anatomically modern human suffering from microcephaly, a deformity characterised by a small brain. "Everything points to the direction of Homo sapiens, especially the teeth. The teeth in the upper and lower jaw are clearly sapiens," Professor Jacob said at the time.

However, most other experts in the field dismissed his suggestion, including Professor Richard Roberts of the University of Wollongong in Australia who was a senior member of the team that made the discovery. "Professor Jacob's assertion that the remains are just a scaled-down version of Homo sapiens is incorrect. There are a plethora of anatomical features that argue against this conclusion," Professor Roberts said.

It is understood that Professor Jacob took possession of the bones under the terms of a private agreement with a long-time colleague, Professor Radien Soejono of Indonesia's Centre for Archaeology in Jakarta, who was also a member of the team who made the discovery and analysed the bones. However, according to one scientist close to the dispute, the bones were handed over without the knowledge or permission of the centre's director, Tony Djubiantono, or other senior members of his staff. "They are extremely angry about this and are demanding that the material be returned as soon as possible or they will be making formal complaints at ministerial level," the scientist said.

Professor Roberts said that Professor Jacob may feel disgruntled about the fact that other scientists outside Indonesia have had early access to the remains and so were able to describe them formally in the journal Nature. "There's a touch of sour grapes I suspect," he said.
Source
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Oct, 2005 10:02 pm
But, wait, there's more! Scientists have found more hobbit-like remains on the indonesian island..... BBC

This:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40830000/jpg/_40830864_lb_turney_203.jpg

was likely the home for someone like:
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40830000/jpg/_40830752_hobbit_bbc_203.jpg

I love this stuff!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Petite skull reopens human ancestry debate
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:51:53