1
   

AARP: Drug Prices Jumped in Early 2004

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 08:40 am
Jul 1, 10:23 AM EDT
AARP: Drug Prices Jumped in Early 2004

By MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Even after the new Medicare law promised billions of dollars in government spending on prescription drugs, makers of best-selling medications raised prices quickly, nearly triple the rate of inflation, an AARP survey found.

Pharmaceutical companies increased the prices they charge drug wholesalers for the top 200 brand-name drugs an average of 3.4 percent in the first three months of 2004, while inflation in general was 1.2 percent, according to the survey AARP released Wednesday.

It covered the period after the new Medicare law was enacted and just before the Bush administration began its pharmacy discount card program.

The administration says the drug cards are offering Medicare recipients 11 percent to 18 percent savings on brand name drugs, but AARP said the price increases offset some of the promised savings and demonstrate anew the need to legalize cheaper drug imports from Canada and elsewhere. Drug companies and the administration oppose that move, citing safety concerns.

"It's disappointing that prices jumped after the legislation was signed, after they had assurances that they'd have a broader market to sell to," AARP policy director John Rother said.

The law is estimated to cost $395 billion to $534 billion over 10 years, much of it directed to prescription drug purchases by older and disabled Americans that the government has not previously paid for.

Most of the top 10 selling drugs increased more than the average, led by Bristol-Myers Squibb's Plavix. The price of the blood thinner increased by 7.9 percent, AARP said.

Merck and Co. raised the price of Fosamax for osteoporosis by 4.9 percent, while the most popular forms of Celebrex, a pain reliever, and cholesterol-reducing Lipitor - both made by Pfizer - increased by 5 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively.

"Manufacturers are offsetting discounts with prices that are higher than they otherwise would have been," Rother said at a news conference held by the 35 million-member seniors' group.

The price increases also diminish the purchasing power of older Americans whose Social Security income goes up at the much slower pace of inflation.

The Medicare card program began in June, although companies started advertising their prices in late April.
Under the program, companies that offer the discount card negotiate lower prices with drug companies and pharmacies.

Medicare beneficiaries can buy the cards for up to $30 and get discounts on drugs they purchase at neighborhood pharmacies or by mail order. Poor people get the cards free, plus $600 a year to fill their prescriptions. Several drug companies will provide their products at little or no cost once that aid is exhausted.

Prescription drug coverage through Medicare begins in 2006, replacing the temporary card program.

Mark McClellan, the administration's Medicare chief, said in an interview that people who use the cards are seeing significant savings. "None of our beneficiaries should be paying anything close to list prices for drugs, and more help is available than ever before," McClellan said.

Since the program began - after the price increases - the lowest prices available with a discount card have been essentially unchanged for Celebrex, Fosamax and Lipitor, three-best selling drugs that The Associated Press has been tracking.

All can be bought at roughly the same prices through the online pharmacy drugstore.com and for much less in Canada.

AARP gave crucial backing to the new Medicare law, but has been a vocal critic of pharmaceutical manufacturers and their congressional allies who have resisted legalizing drug imports. The seniors group also has urged drug makers to limit price increases to the rate of inflation, to no avail.

Rother singled out Bristol-Myers and Pfizer, which between them produce 12 of the 25 top-selling drugs. Bristol Myers-Squibb prices rose 7.2 percent, while Pfizer increased its prices 4.8 percent in the first three months of 2004, AARP said.

Pfizer spokeswoman Laura Glick acknowledged the prices went up, but said those are annual increases that typically occur in January. "And that doesn't include mandatory government discounts and other negotiated discounts," Glick said. "We are committed to responsible pricing."

Bristol-Myers spokesman Rob Hutchison said the company spends an average of $800 million on each new drug it develops. "The prices of our innovative medicines reflect the research needed to discover and develop them," he said.

Despite the increase in Fosamax, Merck & Co. showed average price increases of 1.6 percent. It has acknowledged raising the price of the painkiller Vioxx by 4.8 percent in March. AARP showed no increase in the price of Vioxx, but said the higher price shows up in its April data.



The newly passed legislation is working it is helping those it was intended to. The pharmaceutical industry. That was it's purpose or was it?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 959 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 01:24 pm
Re: AARP: Drug Prices Jumped in Early 2004
au1929 wrote:
Jul 1, 10:23 AM EDT
AARP: Drug Prices Jumped in Early 2004

By MARK SHERMAN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Even after the new Medicare law promised billions of dollars in government spending on prescription drugs, makers of best-selling medications raised prices quickly, nearly triple the rate of inflation, an AARP survey found.

Pharmaceutical companies increased the prices they charge drug wholesalers for the top 200 brand-name drugs an average of 3.4 percent in the first three months of 2004, while inflation in general was 1.2 percent, according to the survey AARP released Wednesday.

It covered the period after the new Medicare law was enacted and just before the Bush administration began its pharmacy discount card program.

The administration says the drug cards are offering Medicare recipients 11 percent to 18 percent savings on brand name drugs, but AARP said the price increases offset some of the promised savings and demonstrate anew the need to legalize cheaper drug imports from Canada and elsewhere. Drug companies and the administration oppose that move, citing safety concerns.

"It's disappointing that prices jumped after the legislation was signed, after they had assurances that they'd have a broader market to sell to," AARP policy director John Rother said.

The law is estimated to cost $395 billion to $534 billion over 10 years, much of it directed to prescription drug purchases by older and disabled Americans that the government has not previously paid for.

Most of the top 10 selling drugs increased more than the average, led by Bristol-Myers Squibb's Plavix. The price of the blood thinner increased by 7.9 percent, AARP said.

Merck and Co. raised the price of Fosamax for osteoporosis by 4.9 percent, while the most popular forms of Celebrex, a pain reliever, and cholesterol-reducing Lipitor - both made by Pfizer - increased by 5 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively.

"Manufacturers are offsetting discounts with prices that are higher than they otherwise would have been," Rother said at a news conference held by the 35 million-member seniors' group.

The price increases also diminish the purchasing power of older Americans whose Social Security income goes up at the much slower pace of inflation.

The Medicare card program began in June, although companies started advertising their prices in late April.
Under the program, companies that offer the discount card negotiate lower prices with drug companies and pharmacies.

Medicare beneficiaries can buy the cards for up to $30 and get discounts on drugs they purchase at neighborhood pharmacies or by mail order. Poor people get the cards free, plus $600 a year to fill their prescriptions. Several drug companies will provide their products at little or no cost once that aid is exhausted.

Prescription drug coverage through Medicare begins in 2006, replacing the temporary card program.

Mark McClellan, the administration's Medicare chief, said in an interview that people who use the cards are seeing significant savings. "None of our beneficiaries should be paying anything close to list prices for drugs, and more help is available than ever before," McClellan said.

Since the program began - after the price increases - the lowest prices available with a discount card have been essentially unchanged for Celebrex, Fosamax and Lipitor, three-best selling drugs that The Associated Press has been tracking.

All can be bought at roughly the same prices through the online pharmacy drugstore.com and for much less in Canada.

AARP gave crucial backing to the new Medicare law, but has been a vocal critic of pharmaceutical manufacturers and their congressional allies who have resisted legalizing drug imports. The seniors group also has urged drug makers to limit price increases to the rate of inflation, to no avail.

Rother singled out Bristol-Myers and Pfizer, which between them produce 12 of the 25 top-selling drugs. Bristol Myers-Squibb prices rose 7.2 percent, while Pfizer increased its prices 4.8 percent in the first three months of 2004, AARP said.

Pfizer spokeswoman Laura Glick acknowledged the prices went up, but said those are annual increases that typically occur in January. "And that doesn't include mandatory government discounts and other negotiated discounts," Glick said. "We are committed to responsible pricing."

Bristol-Myers spokesman Rob Hutchison said the company spends an average of $800 million on each new drug it develops. "The prices of our innovative medicines reflect the research needed to discover and develop them," he said.

Despite the increase in Fosamax, Merck & Co. showed average price increases of 1.6 percent. It has acknowledged raising the price of the painkiller Vioxx by 4.8 percent in March. AARP showed no increase in the price of Vioxx, but said the higher price shows up in its April data.



The newly passed legislation is working it is helping those it was intended to. The pharmaceutical industry. That was it's purpose or was it?


Drug prices went up and so do lots of other prices. For instance, $4/gallon of milk. Is that fair?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Jul, 2004 02:16 pm
Miller
Perhaps you do not understand. Let me enlighten you, the program was allegedly designed to help the elderly not the "Poor" Pharmaceutical industry.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Sep, 2004 07:42 am
BUSH STILL PUSHING LIES IN REFUSING TO LOWER DRUG PRICES

President Bush continues to oppose allowing American seniors to purchase lower-priced, FDA-approved medicines from Canada.[1] His administration has claimed those prescription drugs would be unsafe, and is working to block a vote on bipartisan Senate legislation to make reimportation legal.[2] But as a new drug industry whistleblower notes, the scare tactics are dishonest and untrue.

Dr. Peter Rost, vice-president of marketing for the pharmaceutical company Pfizer, recently came out and debunked the White House's argument, saying reimportation "has been proven to be safe in Europe" and that "The safety issue is a made-up story."[3] Rost's comments are consistent with the Bush administration's own FDA officials who have been unable to provide any evidence that medicines from Canada are unsafe.[4]

President Bush's opposition to reimportation is backed by the drug industry - the same special interest that has donated lavishly to the GOP. According to the non-profit watchdog Public Campaign, the drug industry has given Republican candidates more than $36 million since 1999. President Bush has raked in more than $418,000 from the pharmaceutical industry, and lists many drug industry executives and lobbyists as his top fundraisers.[5]

Sources:

1. "Big Pharma fears a Kerry win will lead to curbs on drug prices," The Independent Portfolio, 9/22/04, http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3382691&l=59520.
2. "Frist won't bring drug import legislation up for vote," The Tennessean, 9/16/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3382691&l=59521.
3. "Surprise Support For Drug Importing," Washington Post, 9/14/04,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3382691&l=59522.
4. "FDA lacks examples of Canadian drugs harming Americans," Knight Ridder, 11/26/03,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3382691&l=59523.
5. "Paybacks: Prescription Drugs," Public Campaign, 8/2004,
http://daily.misleader.org/ctt.asp?u=3382691&l=59524.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » AARP: Drug Prices Jumped in Early 2004
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/17/2024 at 09:04:57