8
   

Is the basic premise of transcendental idealism still valid?

Forums: Philosophy, Transcendental Idealism
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 01:48 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

Laughing "Apparently".
Apparently you thought getting tattooed as a senior was a good idea !




Not sure I ever thought it was a "good idea"...but it was something I wanted to do.

So I did it.

Gotta acknowledge there are many things I have not especially considered "good ideas"...that I have done...just because I wanted to.

Do you have a point here...or are you just acknowledging that you are out of ammunition?
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 01:54 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Well its beyond words really...I don't know what to say except that the judgemental comment Fresco did on your personal choices goes well along with his reasoning skills. It gives him away pretty quickly. It amazes me that you decided to reply.
fresco
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 01:58 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Why would I need ammunition to counter vacuous bleating ? Sheep do tend to follow other sheep in matters of behavior (or fashion).
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:01 pm
@fresco,
You are not just a blunt ignoramus, your are vicious, venal, and utterly stupid !
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:01 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Well yeah.
I pretty much kind of basically agree

I certainly did not mean to label you 'pontiff'.

Very Happy
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:09 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Waitaminnit!
Did you get a senior tattoo?
Or, did I miss something?

I was going to get a tattoo "USDA PRIME"
Then, after seeing a candid photo of how my physique has aged, I concluded "BEACHED WHALE" would be more of an embarassment, so I sneaked off without saying why I was there.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:10 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Obviously Fresco has allowed himself to get out of control, Fil. His reaction is no longer rising above the level of gutter talk.

He really does not take kindly to people who have a different take from him on matters under discussion here. He seems to want us all to defer to his take...and to his long list of authorities to whom he constantly appeals.
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:11 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Smile Lots of things seem to amaze you at the moment !

Not much philosophy goes on these threads when the social dancing starts. Frank is here as usual to get me to rise to his bleating. and you are here as usual to push your computational TOE. Of the three of us, I am the only one who has attempted to address the OP despite two little dogs snapping at my heels.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:12 pm
@neologist,
Thanks, Neo.

I was at an audience with a pope...and I did once aspire to a religious vocation. But "pontiff material" I am not. Wink
Fil Albuquerque
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:27 pm
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:28 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
...and I did once aspire to a religious vocation...

Interesting ! I should be able to make good use of that ! Wink
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:37 pm
@fresco,
Feel free, Fresco. It certainly is not something I am ashamed of.

I suspect many Catholic young men find themselves drawn in that direction.

It came upon me at about age 18...and lasted until age 21.

It was much better for me and the Church that I managed to get over it before making the move to the priesthood.

We both dodged a bullet. Wink
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:40 pm
@neologist,
http://able2know.org/topic/9997-1
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 02:44 pm
@fresco,
fresco wrote:

Quote:
...and I did once aspire to a religious vocation...

Interesting ! I should be able to make good use of that ! Wink


This is the kind of comment that shows that I am not wrong about you. Sadly !
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 03:12 pm
@Fil Albuquerque,
Why sadly ? Just think, "I" could be the one thing you might be right about !
Fil Albuquerque
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 30 May, 2015 03:35 pm
@fresco,
Another easy pot shot...vulgar as usual.
...if anything I am one of the few around that writes something fresh and that bothers to actually explain it in a way that people can grasp. You on the other hand sound like a broken record and when asked for logical clarification never provide any.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
The Void and the Absolute Oneness of the Universe - Discussion by Relinquish
can we reconcile darkness in man with madness(lunacy) ? - Question by studentnorway
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
In the GRAND scheme of things, what matters? - Question by komr98
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
How can something come from nothing? - Question by ripple
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is the basic premise of transcendental idealism still valid?
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/09/2025 at 06:42:39
▲ ▼