Cycloptichorn wrote:I guess that Flows has a point.
There is a lot of good news coming from Iraq these days - after all, there are a lot of people over there working very very hard.
...It's sometimes hard to see the good news, because the shadow cast by the bad news is so damn big....
Cycloptichorn
Part of the good news lies in things which are no longer happening.
We haven't had any more buildings blown down in the last three years.
We haven't had any further attempts to poison the US senate office building with anthrax.
Iraq is no longer running a school for terrorism with actual mockup airliners.
There is no FURTHER evidence of mustard agents or cyanide running off into the Tigris or Euphrates rivers.
There are no more large cash payments to the families of suicide murderers emanating from Iraq.
And there are a number of other fairly invisible dividents from the operation as well.
Now, the shadow you mention was many decades in the making and every administration since FDR shares in the guilt/blame for it. It arose from the necessities of the cold war and from having to deal with the one major totalitarian system leftover after WW-II.
George W. Bush is actually trying to fix the problem. He was absolutely correct in determining that the most major problem in the middle east was the total lack of responsible government, and that one large arab democracy in the region would likely go a very long way towards improving life in the entire region.
There is a very real chance it could work, and about the only other option which was open to him after 9-11 was to do what I'd probably have done, i.e. nuke Mecca and Medina from orbit and try to ban the practice of Islam throughout the world. A reasonable person has to like the idea of trying the humanitarian approach FIRST.
I did post a very good article on this toipic a while back:
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=26960&highlight=&sid=3c2a34422edcab2651d930a3f034da53