get this woman out of my view/politics

They shrug off questions about Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email habits. They roll with the attacks on her family’s foundation, the big checks from foreign governments, the torpid response of her not-yet-campaign.

They have little choice: As Mrs. Clinton prepares to begin her second presidential campaign amid a froth of criticism and outrage, Democrats are not just Ready for Hillary — as supporters named one pro-Clinton “super PAC” — they are desperate for her.

Congressional Democrats are counting on a strong Clinton campaign to help lift them back into the majority. Party leaders at all levels want her fund-raising help and demographic appeal. And from the top of the party to its grass roots, Mrs. Clinton’s pseudo-incumbency is papering over significant disadvantages: a weak bench, a long-term House minority and a white middle class defecting to the Republican Party faster than the Democrats’ hoped-for demographic future is expected to arrive.

Mrs. Clinton, many Democrats say, is simply too big to fail.

“There is no one else — she’s the whole plan,” said Sarah Kovner, a leading Democratic donor and fund-raiser in New York.

Clinton’s strategy, however, relies on cooperation from the press to lose interest in the story and leave Republicans as the sole inquisitors.

There was little evidence of that Wednesday, however. Clinton’s press conference landed the front page of every major national newspaper in the country and dominated cable news and social media chatter. The coveraged – including msnbc – focused on questions Clinton did not answer. And the generally staid AP announced it would sue the State Department to gain access to Clinton’s emails.

Quote:

If she should be playing any card, it should be the "Republicans hate government...and have absolutely no idea of how to govern...so they should stay the hell out of the way rather than being the obstructionists they are being"...CARD.

I dont think " the other guy sucks worse than me" is going to go very far this time around. And besides, the R's are likely going to come with " Conservatism did not fail, it was never tried, so lets give it a chance". And they will come with somebody who has barely ever set foot in Washington, like Walker. Any unhappiness with Congressional R's will not matter, because the R nominee will come back with "I dont think much of them either, but I will lead them to a better place".

I am not shocked that D's at the moment seem to not understand just how unlikely to get the POTUS chair they are.

She was humiliated by Obama...

That Lincoln, what a crappy leader he was, right Frank? Teddy Roosevelt? The worse, I mean except Eisenhower.

Then Reagan, my god the stink he left! Ugh...

... yeah, those Republicans just have no idea how to govern.

And chances are it will be an R who runs on an anti washington agenda ala Reagan. I hope you can live with that. Whites are fleeing the D's, and the plan to counter that with feminist dogma is not going to cut it.

I registered independent when I moved to New Mexico, but then the light dawned that I couldn't vote in Dem primaries, which are important to me. In reality, I am more lefto than most of todays Democrats, or so it seems; thus, explaining part of my ongoing griping about Hillary Clinton

The problem with the current progressive label is that it assumes "champion of victim culture". Hostility to victim culture would be the true progressive stance, as victim culture is the mainline culture, and has been for 50 years.

Aren't they in Cincinnati?