45
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 3 Feb, 2020 01:28 am
@MontereyJack,
Another post where you've failed to provide any examples to back up your claims.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 3 Feb, 2020 09:28 am
@oralloy,
blah blah blah. repeating untrue statements does not magically make them true.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 3 Feb, 2020 09:50 am
@MontereyJack,
Not untrue at all. You really did once again fail to provide any examples to back up your claim.
RABEL222
 
  4  
Reply Mon 3 Feb, 2020 03:22 pm
@oralloy,
You just proved his post with your lieing post.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 3 Feb, 2020 06:24 pm
@RABEL222,
You still cannot provide any examples of anything untrue in my posts.

You still cannot provide any examples of anything true in your posts.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 01:34 am
@oralloy,
I don't have too. You do a perfect job on your own.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 02:03 am
@RABEL222,
Yet another claim that you are unable to back up with any examples.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 10:17 am
@oralloy,
I just gave you one. What's wrong? Having trouble reading English?
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 05:33 pm
Quote:
Meet the Dems’ Choice to Answer Trump’s State of the Union: The Very Insecure Governor of Michigan

Not the best record. But credibility does not matter if she says what she is told.
Quote:
Gretchen Whitmer is the perfect Democrat to respond to President Trump’s State of the Union Address: a bitter, insecure, and isolated executive who can’t work with anybody and blames everybody else, versus Donald Trump, accomplishing landmark deals while letting nothing bother him.

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/meet-the-dems-choice-to-answer-trumps-state-of-the-union-the-very-insecure-governor-of-michigan/
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 07:42 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:
I just gave you one.

No you didn't.


RABEL222 wrote:
What's wrong? Having trouble reading English?

No. No troubles. I was able to see your failure quite clearly.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 09:50 pm
@oralloy,
Prior to the iowa caucuses Microsoft issued a press release in which they seem to be claiming credit for the apps both parties used. so contrary to oralloy's repeated claims about progressive incompetence, it was not progressives but Microsoft. what a surprise. https://www.cnet.com/news/microsoft-put-to-the-test-in-tonights-iowa-caucuses/
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 10:14 pm
@MontereyJack,
Notice that conservatives didn't have any trouble using the apps to report their results?

Was it Microsoft who kept the caucus guy on hold for hours and then hung up on him on national TV?
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 11:50 pm
@oralloy,
the republican app was simple. everybody just voted for trump. the dem app hadto deal with as I understand it a new voting system, they introduced kind of a baby version of PR voting (proportional representation, not public relations) which is pretty rare in the states, but big in Oz and NZ, and has been kind of a bugaboo for programmers for years, and it looks like MS blew It for the dems.ItPR is designed tp weight your choices and if your first choice is eliminated for insufficient votes your second choice can get counted, too put it very simply. It's been a good-government initiative for decades but it's complex and it looks like MS blew the code and didn't train people enough. Can take days if you have to hand count one because the code doesn't work.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Tue 4 Feb, 2020 11:58 pm
@MontereyJack,
Multiple rounds of voting is not a new system in Iowa. What is new this year is limiting it to two rounds.

Previously in Iowa, people who supported non-viable candidates had many rounds of voting to swap and keep swapping their votes to someone else.

The multiple rounds are not done electronically either. People actually physically walk to whatever cluster of people represents whoever they are going to support in that round. And everyone can talk and debate with each other to try to change each other's minds.

That's why I think a caucus sounds a lot more fun than a primary where you just mark a ballot and go home.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 12:07 am
@oralloy,
Good for Iowans. pr can be much more involving, however it's done. there were two different systems okf voting, and MS apparently provided two different apps, which means a whole lot of opportunity to get the more complex one coded wrong, which apparently they did. Maybe you should mokve to Ozif you're looking for fiun in electkons. Buen viaje.
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 09:57 am
@MontereyJack,
The problems that the Democrats were having with their app centered on people not being able to download the app to begin with. Or not being able to log on if they did manage to download it.

Most likely, the difference with the Republicans is probably just a matter of taking the time to train their people how to use the app ahead of time so that they knew what they were doing on election day.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 04:43 pm
https://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Pelosi-Ripped-LI-600.jpg
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 04:47 pm
@coldjoint,
stupid stupid stupid dranco. gthe trump SOTU was the usual trump farrago of lies, distortions , half=truths ans self-flattery. Pelosi did t it exactly what it desercvee. branco remains a buffoon.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 04:58 pm
@oralloy,
Not so. two different apps probably written by two squads of coders, and one completely blew it. the porroblems apkparently ensnared everyone working with the dems. If it were only a matter of training, some would have gotten it right, but it seemed pretty universal. saw an article on boingboing by an IT guy who alkso was a poll worker and he had problems too which professional knowledge should have gotten him around. <Most likely just what MS said, a coding error. from whoever wrote the app, not "progressives" fault as oralloy's go-to explanation for anything that goes wrong in the universe would have it.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Feb, 2020 05:15 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
was the usual trump farrago of lies, distortions , half=truths ans self-flattery.

Quote:
Fact-Checking 11 of Trump’s Claims in State of the Union

What he said was true. That you do not want this country to thrive, and cannot accept the fact it is, is very sad.
https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/02/05/fact-checking-11-of-trumps-claims-in-state-of-the-union/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=fact-checking-11-of-trumps-claims-in-state-of-the-union?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTVdabVptRTJaR1V3TlRrMyIsInQiOiJcL1lhamhBTzlDSWdScmxPS1NRXC84MEsyM2ZHbWZ6ZzhlV3RLdmpUeVBVY1ZuK3dFOG9xYkRkMHFHdlAxR245enFpMmtLMDZidnFpblZnMjNka2dsNkRTbVIzSmNORE1kbFdrRWNsa2RQS0RwdXRIRlVKUTA4RFc2MkZXNFVXNTFBIn0%3D
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 01/20/2025 at 02:28:38