60
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 06:53 am
@TheCobbler,
TheCobbler wrote:
I have no problem calling Oralloy and CJ names...

Progressives rely on name-calling because they are incapable of defending their ideology using facts or logic.


TheCobbler wrote:
If the shoe fits wear it.

There is nothing even remotely true about your name-calling.


TheCobbler wrote:
You can call me a homosexual and the "f" word and I will wear it proudly... I am gay and proud that I was born this way...

But how would you like it if someone falsely accused you of something that isn't true?


TheCobbler wrote:
But those who value their gun rights over the lives of little school children and innocent civilians well, that is truly shameful...

Progressive attempts to outlaw pistol grips have nothing to do with trying to save lives, and preventing progressives from outlawing pistol grips does not cost any lives.


TheCobbler wrote:
Did I just call you guy names? Yea... Names that have meaning and that suit you to a tee.

Your false accusations against people do not suit them at all.


TheCobbler wrote:
If you are offended by yourself then that is your problem.

We are offended by your untrue accusations against us.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 02:19 pm
@oralloy,
12 more paragraph's of your usual bull shyt.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 02:39 pm
@RABEL222,
Your inability to point out anything that I am wrong about is evidence that everything I say is true.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 03:09 pm
@oralloy,
Oh come off it. You have always been a flaming name caller yourself. Pot and kettle.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 03:50 pm
@MontereyJack,
You cannot provide any examples of me ever engaging in name-calling other than fair and proportionate retaliation for name-calling that was directed at me first.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 04:51 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
You have always been a flaming name caller yourself.

You know that is not true. Calling the progressives freedom haters is a general statement directed at a group, not a person.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 06:16 pm
@coldjoint,
Name calling is nane calling. Name calling of a group is precisely as odious as personal name calking, the only difference is it doesnt excite the hamsters as oralloy knows wll which is why he does it that way. Flaming name calling is his modus operandi. Calling members of a group a name is the same as calling a specific member of a group that name. Its merely more general. Sophistry on yor part is infantile.
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 06:29 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Flaming name calling is his modus operandi.

No, it is not. That is ridiculous.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 06:54 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EOLra7dWoAA6DZK?format=jpg&name=medium
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 07:47 pm
@coldjoint,
1988: As a result of Iranian aggression, America accidentally shoots down a passenger jet.
Progressives blame America.

2020: As a result of Iranian aggression, Iran accidentally shoots down a passenger jet.
Progressives blame America.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 07:49 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Flaming name calling is his modus operandi.

Again, you cannot provide any examples of me ever engaging in name-calling, other than fair and proportionate retaliation for name-calling that was directed at me first.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 11:41 pm
@coldjoint,
Yes, it clearly is. Your little tin idol has feet of clay.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 11:43 pm
@oralloy,
oh nonsense. Completley out of the blue you start name calling and virtue signal about it.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Reply Mon 13 Jan, 2020 11:45 pm
@coldjoint,
Photoshopped nonsense. How despicable,
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 12:48 am
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Photoshopped nonsense. How despicable,

Photoshopped! Really? Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:01 am
Quote:
Democratic candidate Elizabeth Warren claims rival Bernie Sanders told her a woman could not win the 2020 election.

Ms Warren said the comment was made during a two-hour meeting with Mr Sanders in 2018.

Mr Sanders denied the claim and said he believed a woman could beat President Donald Trump.

Mr Sanders and Ms Warren are the most prominent progressive candidates vying for the Democratic nomination in November's presidential election.

Correspondents say the spat is a breakaway from the unstated non-aggression pact between the two politicians seeking to appeal to left-wing voters.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51101676<br />

We could do without this ****.
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 02:32 am
@izzythepush,
Both of them are pissing me off.
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 03:45 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
oh nonsense. Completley out of the blue you start name calling

The fact that you cannot provide any examples of me engaging in name-calling (other than fair and proportionate retaliation for name-calling that was directed at me first) is evidence that I have never done such a thing.


MontereyJack wrote:
and virtue signal about it.

You also are unable to provide any examples of virtue signaling on my part.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 05:00 am
@glitterbag,
I know, it's like Roosevelt and Churchill arguing over who gets the best parking space while Hitler romps across Europe.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 14 Jan, 2020 12:24 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
it's like Roosevelt and Churchill

It is more like Abbott and Costello arguing who is on first.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.12 seconds on 11/30/2020 at 11:48:52