50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:56 am
Quote:
Donald Trump, Kanye West, Chance the Rapper and Dragon Energy

Blacks do not have to be, or vote, Democratic. No kidding. Now there are quite successful black men telling them so. Candace Owens will keep the ball rolling.

Democrats cannot afford lose more than 2% of the black vote. Looks like they will lose more than that. Remember these are young blacks following Kanye and Chance.

http://victorygirlsblog.com/donald-trump-kanye-west-chance-the-rapper-and-dragon-energy/
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:57 am
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:
Got to love a two faced bastard, right?
Why do you call the French president to be
a) a bastard,
b) two faced?

He's Macron strongly influenced by Paul Ricoeur’s philosophy - the appearance of Macron in Washington followed the ideas of his philosophical teacher.
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  7  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 12:27 pm
@coldjoint,
I know that you can.
So you just did it without reason, because you were in the mood to do so.

You respond in such a way regularly, isn't it?
Below viewing threshold (view)
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2018 11:29 pm
Clean energy does not have to fight to remain viable because it is non-polluting but dirty energy needs to pay people to back-stab the environment so it can continue making money at the expense of our clean air, clean water and fragile ecosystems.

Dirty energy is the republican party's cash cow, it needs dishonest people to exist.

Clean energy only has to fight to thrive and exist in the face of the sheer profiteering by dirty energy and its negative effect on our electorate.
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 12:52 am
Growth, down. Stock market, down. Optimism, down. The tax cut boost to the economy, non-existent.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/4/25/1759899/-Growth-down-Stock-market-down-Optimism-down-The-tax-cut-boost-to-the-economy-non-existent
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  4  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 01:40 am
@revelette1,
The KKK is a far greater threat in this country, to liberty and rule of law, than the majority of Muslim immigrants.

The KKK considers itself a Christian organization. Therefore, when will Trump institute a "Christian ban"?

And where should we deport our own homegrown Christian terrorists?

To ban people and countries based upon religious affiliation is unconstitutional and stands contrary to freedom of religion.

Norway had a right-wing Christian terrorist shoot up a whole school of kids!

Should Norway now have a Christian ban?

Any ban that includes the name of a major religion in its criterion is unconstitutional.

If a religion has racism and violence associated with it then we need to look no further than our own country.
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 03:50 am
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 08:16 am
Workers at Chinese Factory for Ivanka Trump's Clothing Paid $62 a Week: Report
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/workers-chinese-factory-ivanka-trump-s-clothing-paid-62-week-n751431

0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 09:14 am
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
The KKK is a far greater threat in this country, to liberty and rule of law, than the majority of Muslim immigrants.

Both sets of extremists are a threat to this nation. I do like how you compared an extreme group to a broad general group though.

Quote:
The KKK considers itself a Christian organization. Therefore, when will Trump institute a "Christian ban"?

First off there was no Muslim ban, the SCOTUS should be ruling on that soon. Second, the KKK is mostly made up of citizens of the US, plus with the 1st Amendment, you can't ban them, just as you can't ban illegal immigrants protesting in the streets.

Quote:
And where should we deport our own homegrown Christian terrorists?

You can't deport US citizens.

Quote:
To ban people and countries based upon religious affiliation is unconstitutional and stands contrary to freedom of religion.

Actually, people who are not in the US do not have any Constitutional protections. Besides the ban was not done due to religion, if it was, there were over 50 nations he left off the list. Banning people from coming from a specific is Constitutional, no one has a right to come to the US, except US citizens.

Quote:
Norway had a right-wing Christian terrorist shoot up a whole school of kids!

So much for other countries not having mass shootings... The EU has had a rash of terrorists attacks, should they kick out people who were like the offenders?

Quote:
Should Norway now have a Christian ban?

That would be up to them and what their laws allow for immigration.

Quote:
Any ban that includes the name of a major religion in its criterion is unconstitutional.

There are no bans that mention any religion. If you can provide me with the letter of the ban and where it mentions Muslims I might believe you.

Quote:
If a religion has racism and violence associated with it then we need to look no further than our own country.

Yeah yeah yeah, you don't like white Christians, we get it.

0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 09:18 am
Quote:
Democrats are well-positioned for gains in the November midterm elections, according to new data from the Harvard CAPS/Harris Poll that shows a double-digit preference among voters for Democrats to control the House and Senate.

Fifty-six percent of registered voters told pollsters they would rather see Democrats controlling the House of Representatives after the 2018 midterm elections, while 55 percent of voters polled said they wanted Democrats to control the Senate.

Democrats also have a 9-point lead — 43 percent to 34 percent — when voters are asked whether they support a Democratic or Republican candidate in their district. And the Democratic Party has a slightly higher favorability mark, at 42 percent, than the Republican Party, which 38 percent of respondents viewed favorably.


The Hill
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 11:10 am
@revelette1,
I hope the election turns out that way. Polls are never 100%.
https://www.cnet.com/news/twitter-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-president-republican-democrats/
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 01:27 pm
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
Clean energy does not have to fight to remain viable because it is non-polluting but dirty energy needs to pay people to back-stab the environment so it can continue making money at the expense of our clean air, clean water and fragile ecosystems.

Clean energy gets a higher proportion of payouts from the govt than other forms of energy. Without govt payments, almost nobody would by buying green tech, it isn't as efficient for energy costs without the subsidies they get. Considering that only the upper middle class on up can only afford to buy these new items, the majority of the money paid out goes to the wealthy. The middle class and poor can't afford solar panels even with the money back from the govt, it costs between 25k and 35k to install panels, and the govt gives up to 50% in subsidies or rebates, so the average person would have to come up with between 10-18K to "save" money on their electricity bill, the govt, read as taxpayers, pays the rest of the cost.



Quote:
Dirty energy is the republican party's cash cow, it needs dishonest people to exist.

"Dirty energy" as you call it, powers a vast majority of the world as we know it and without "dirty energy" the world would never have reached our current level of development. Do you have the slightest idea the magnitude of products that come from oil besides just gas? It's like there is some sort of disconnect in reality from what you think the world is and what it really is. More than likely 95% of the stuff you own and thrive on wouldn't exist without oil.

Quote:
Clean energy only has to fight to thrive and exist in the face of the sheer profiteering by dirty energy and its negative effect on our electorate.

Oh please. Clean energy has to be able to compete in the free market and not live off of up to 50% of their income coming from the taxpayers. Don't kid yourself either, if you think clean energy isn't out to make a profit, then you are naive.

I'm all for cutting off subsidies to all sorts of places to include oil. The problem is, oil would be fine as a commodity and continue on with no issues since it has more uses besides just for power, clean energy would die without it as it has no other purpose. Hell, you need oil to build solar panels, isn't that a kick in the pants.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 04:53 pm
@TheCobbler,
Quote:
The KKK is a far greater threat in this country, to liberty and rule of law, than the majority of Muslim immigrants.


Where and when was their last terror attack. That is a ridiculous lie.

Islam is intolerant, supremacist, violent and teaches hate to a quarter of the worlds population. The KKK would not amount to a pimple on their (Islam's) ass.
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 06:52 pm
@coldjoint,
That's nonsense. Islam is a decentralized religion. Some sects are those things, but the vast majority of Muslims are not, anymore than Christianity is homophobic because certain sects are.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 07:04 pm
@MontereyJack,
Some people get educated by watching FOX News. It's the perfect way to remain ignorant on many fronts, and spew lies learned from their main source of information.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/feb/26/fact-checks-behind-daily-shows-50-fox-news-lies/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2018 08:28 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Islam is a decentralized religion.


It is most certainly is not, read the Koran. Learn about the "ummah"

Quote:
the whole community of Muslims bound together by ties of religion.

Muhammad completed Islam, there are only the obligations he imposed is the duty of advancing Islam until it rules the world. As we have seen they do not care how it is done and sanctions terror. They can do that just being Muslims and refuse to discuss what the religion says and say it is an insult to ask why it teaches hate. By every standard of hate speech today verses from the Koran and Hadith are hateful.

The refusal to call Islam out shows that freedom is not all that important to the powers that be. The US can't do it alone, but I sure hope we try.



The Bible is irrelevant to these facts, unless someone is suing Muhammad for plagiarism.

0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2018 06:48 am
Quote:
Timothy Egan: To Beat Trump, Build a Better Biden

If the election were held today, Joe Biden would crush President Trump. Almost any other Democrat — including one named Generic Democrat — would also beat the man who runs an administration of kooks, quacks, criminals, drunks, wife-beaters and grifters.

Sadly, there remains a sizable constituency for incompetency on this scale — the look-the-other-way evangelicals, the get-yours-while-you-can corporate class, the-ditch-your-principles Republican office holders. They’re with Stupid, no matter how much Trump debases the office.

But you can’t beat nothing with better-than-nothing. Not-Trump is not enough. Quick: What are Democrats for? Continuity With Change? Stronger Together? A Better Deal? Two of those are actual slogans of the national party, and one is from the feckless politician on “Veep.”

Surprisingly, the Democrats are thinking big for once. The ideas being tossed around are risky enough to be called bold: a guaranteed-jobs program, universal health care, a public option for banking, free community college.

But the best-known carriers of that message have problems. Nancy Pelosi is toxic in many a targeted red-to-blue district. Chuck Schumer sounds too much like a party hack. The presidential contenders all have weaknesses.

If you were to go into a lab and create a perfect candidate for 2020, along with a popular policy prescription for this anxious decade, what would that look like? It would be a big-hearted, progressive person whose appeal crosses class lines. It would be someone very much like Biden — a younger Biden. Let’s ignore the age issue for now.


More at NYT.

I don't know if ya'll feel the same way as I do, but, we can't ignore the "progressive" wing of the party. They are the ones with the enthusiam as the piece above later on states. My problem with that wing of the party has been the holier than thou attitude they exhibit towards long time democrats (I am talking of the voting democrats not ones in elected offices), not their ideas. But that seems to be a petty reason when considering the importance of "turning the ballot against republicans."
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2018 09:00 am
@revelette1,
Quote:
Surprisingly, the Democrats are thinking big for once. The ideas being tossed around are risky enough to be called bold: a guaranteed-jobs program, universal health care, a public option for banking, free community college.


What is surprising about Democrats spending others money, rewarding bad behavior, and claiming they can fix the problems they created? Nothing.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 10:19:21