@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:Social Security has provided an income for older people since 1940. Before that, people either had the money on hand when they retired, or-way too often-were on charity or living on the street, dying too early because they couldn't afford medical care. It was an advance in living standards in this country, one which is to be expected as the industrial society took hold and increased the national wealth steadily. You and your conservative colleagues are perfectly happy to see the older people go back to the way it was in the early 1900s, forced to live in back alleys until bad health caught up with them and their misery is ended.
Who are you fooling? Your real goal is to back to the Depression days and if you are old and poor, tough luck gramps.
That is not the goal of the people who want to privatize Social Security.
It is true that these people want to dismantle the government run system and replace it. But they don't want to just turn the elderly out onto the streets. They instead want a system where everyone is able to have a retirement account without the government in charge of everything.
Personally I am not convinced that they have a better system. I believe that some people would end up with little retirement income if their investments did not pan out, and before I agreed to their system I'd want to see some protections against this.
But these people aren't hoping to return America to an era when most people had no retirement income.
Blickers wrote:The problem with the elderly is that they let the loudmouths on Fox and the radio get them all worried about whose going to the public bathroom with them and similar trifles,
The Democrats' push to violate the Second Amendment for fun is no mere trifle. Our freedom really is in jeopardy from the Democrats. All financial considerations have to come in second to that.
Blickers wrote:and no attention to the fact that the GOP has been working to pull the financial rug out from underneath them for years and yet the older voters keep voting them in.
Most of the time when the Democrats accuse the Republicans of trying to dismantle Social Security it isn't even true.
For example, in W's second term he was hoping for a bipartisan arrangement to shore up Social Security. Certainly an arrangement that secured the agreement of moderate Democrats would never have dismantled the program.