Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

George W. Bush: Trump Has Right To Pursue Recounts And Legal Challenges Over Election

Yup. Either we underestimated their racism and gullibility, or we overestimated their decency and common sense.

Yeah I hear you. For me, the last four years has had me rethinking that over and over. It's hard for me to reconcile that an intelligent, decent human being could support a POS like 45.

But the odds are that there just HAVE to be intelligent, decent people among the 70 Million people who chose him on election day.
There just HAVE to be, right?

As far as I'm concerned America is a foreign country that I have problems understanding.
The attitude some Americans have towards gun ownership and Universal Health Care is completely alien.

He beat an incumbent president, if that's not a mandate, nothing is.

snood wrote:

Yup. Either we underestimated their racism and gullibility, or we overestimated their decency and common sense.

You make a couple of errors when you associate "disagreement" with racism and gullibility.

You make a couple more errors when you associate "agreement" with decency and common sense.

oralloy wrote:

snood wrote:

Yup. Either we underestimated their racism and gullibility, or we overestimated their decency and common sense.

You make a couple of errors when you associate "disagreement" with racism and gullibility.

You make a couple more errors when you associate "agreement" with decency and common sense.

Uh oh!!!!! You've made two mistakes. Snood was not associating the words to either agreement or disagreement. You shouldn't jump to conclusions.

The Difference Between Proof and Evidence

Sloppy thinkers—as most of us are these days—are prone to confuse the two, for they are related but not the same. Evidence is information that suggests a conclusion. Proof, on the other hand, is a collection of evidence that meets a sufficient standard. So while it’s absurd to say there’s no evidence of voter fraud, it’s not entirely unfair to say there’s not yet proof of voter fraud, depending on what standard we have in mind.

This misunderstanding causes a serious problem. Too many people are suggesting that a supposed lack of evidence should prevent any further investigation into the matter. A lack of proof, however, indicates no such conclusion. There are two key reasons that a lack of proof does not justify sweeping the matter under the rug the way much of the swamp is trying to do.

First of all, proof is the result of investigation, not its prerequisite. You don’t need proof before investigating a matter because proof is what you’re supposed to find (or not find) by its conclusion. In contrast, evidence alone is all you need to justify taking a closer look

Alabama police captain on social media about Biden voters: 'Put a bullet in their skull'
https://abc3340.com/news/local/alabama-police-chief-on-social-media-about-biden-voters-put-a-bullet-in-their-skull

Comment:
Police reform begins with assholes like this.

The election is over but republicans keep going to jail.

TheCobbler wrote:

The election is over but republicans keep going to jail.

If we outlaw the Democratic Party that will put an end to their abuse of the law to harm people they don't agree with.

You obviously don’t see how f*cling stupid it is to keep repeating that.