Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

Progressives falsely accuse everyone of racism as a crutch because progressives can't defend their positions using facts or logic.

Like I said, progressives falsely accuse everyone of racism as a crutch because progressives can't defend their positions using facts or logic.

Just because you don't have any arguments is no reason for you to make false accusations.

There hasn't been enough violence to put a smirk on my face. I'm only going to smirk if I see these ruthless thugs suffer for their crimes.

false bravado

Racism, too . . . he claims that Black Lives Matter wants to murder police officers. He's one sick puppy.

Pointing out the fact that the only purpose of Black Lives Matter is to prevent police officers and white people from defending themselves when black people murder them is hardly racism.

Wrong again. On both counts.

I'm thinking more along the lines of arrested development and stunted imagination.

Instead of looking at racist police violence as something that happens as part of police culture generally, we should see it as something planted into police culture the way drugs are planted on a political rival to incriminate him.

When some racist police officer commits an atrocity, we should follow the money of who such an act benefits and how and then realize that the officers involved are probably planted in their positions by organized interests that have nothing to do with other police who just want to protect law and order for all law abiding people, regardless of identity differences.

Or.....

We can not excuse police brutality by kneeling on someone's neck until they are dead.

And if it was organized crime using a puppet cop to stir up inflammatory self-destruction within a certain community or certain communities, can we excuse that?

Why is it easier to blame governmental institutions than underground criminality for atrocities?

Why do you see police brutality as representative of police generally instead of as a subversion of good police ethics?

talk about stupid conspiracy theorizatuin.

Police are supposed to protect citizens, not kill them. Police have begun to shoot first and ask questions later. And they have to much court protection for wrongful deaths. Especially when the victim is unarmed.

Police used to have more nonlethal options available to them.

Then four police officers were lynched for using nonlethal force to defend themselves from Rodney King in 1992. Now minorities who might have once been clubbed into submission are shot and killed.

The current lynching of the girl in Central Park is also very likely to result in a lot more minorities being killed. Where once people would deal with threatening behavior by calling 911, it is likely that in the future threatening minorities will just be killed by their purported victim without any police involvement.

So it goes.

As I've said before, the other side of what you're talking about is the interest in protecting crime against law enforcement so they can make more money by getting away with more crime more easily and protecting their crime-slaves.

I agree with you that the constitution is supposed to protect people from governmental power, but that was also during a time when the governments of Europe were basically just colonial corporations, i.e. large-scale gangs of mercinaries paid to exploit the people of the world for the benefit of the shareholders.

If you look at organized crime today, it is global in a way that is similar to traditional colonialism. In the 1600s, they might have been trading cinnamon and cloves and tea and other spices and later opium, so now it is not that different to trade cocaine and opioids and other synthetically-produced drugs that have a very high dollar value per gram.

So the limits on governmental power that were enshrined in the constitution can just as easily be applied to organized crime regimes, if those crime regimes were operating out in the open, which they aren't because they want to avoid the kind of regulation they would be subject to under the constitution and state laws, such as prohibition of certain lucrative products.

it's racist to say that, no way around it. It's also false.

That is incorrect. That the only purpose of Black Lives Matter is to prevent police officers and white people from defending themselves when black people murder them is completely true.

Condemning Black Lives Matter goons for their atrocious policies is not racist.

It's very clear from the video she was not being threatened. Shge did the threatening. That's why ther NYPD and the Manhattan DA are looking into charging her with false pkhone calls to hotlines. SHE was the irresponsible one. Nice of you to laud racist murder of innocents. Not the first time you have.

He told her that he was going to do something and she wasn't going to like it, then he tried to lure her pet away from her.



That's why in the future people will not deal with possible threats from a minority by dialing 911. They will simply apply the three S's without involving the police.



People have the right to protect themselves when someone tries to kill their pets.



Protecting oneself from threats is neither racist nor murder.

That is irresponsible untrue hooey.