Tony writes:
Quote:I think relying on the goodness of people is much less of a pipe dream than relying on beaurocratic unaccountable system that is excessivly ineffecient and already proven to be ineffectve
.
Actually I think American benevolence--and I think Americans tend to be the most giving people on Earth--and good old-fashioned American greed, when allowed to work relatively unhampered--are the two factors that provide the most efficient safety net. I do think unemployment insurance, temporary welfare, food stamps, disaster administration (FEMA) etc. are important safety nets.
But put any disaster--a fire, a hurricane, a flood, the bombing of the WTC---and there is always an enormous outpouring of generosity of cash, blankets, food, shelter etc. - UNTIL the government steps in. It feels good giving my $10 or $100 to people in need UNTIL the government offers them thousands and thousands and my little contribution becomes insignifiant. So charity dries up and government takes over. But the people get about 10 to 30% on the dollar from the government. They get 90% or better from a good charity.
And as for greed, you can bet your bottom dollar that not one person goes into business for the 'good of humankind'. People go into business to support themselves hopefully in good style. And the more money they make, the more people they need to help them make it and the more jobs are created. When government adds on regulation after regulation, including requirements for higher wages, etc., it becomes ever more difficult to make the profits. The business owner is unlikely to take those hits so people get laid off or get paid less money. It's as simple as that I think.