18
   

Sarah Palin running in 2016

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:31 pm
@oralloy,
Your FAUX Snooze oratory has no basis, except in your twisted mind.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  4  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:37 pm
I'd call her trailer trash, but that insults too many people who worked darn hard to make the down payment on that 12 x 60 mobile home.
Lustig Andrei
 
  4  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:44 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

Lustig Andrei wrote:
If she's actually the GOP nominee, that's the best news the Democrats could hope for.

Makes no difference. After the 2013 gun control debacle, the Republicans are guaranteed to win in 2016 no matter what.


Do you actually believe all the stupid **** you post?
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:48 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Sure he does, and his confusion is only exceeded by his total ignorance - that he proves over and over with every post.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:54 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Lustig Andrei wrote:
Do you actually believe all the stupid **** you post?

You have a big mouth, but it's funny how you've never been able to point out a single fact that I've ever been wrong about.

As for my prediction, we'll just have to see which party holds the White House after 2016.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 03:56 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

I'd call her trailer trash, but that insults too many people who worked darn hard to make the down payment on that 12 x 60 mobile home.

14X60.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 07:03 pm
@korkamann,
korkamann wrote:

Quote:

Dale...I have to ask: Are you being sarcastic here?


People see different things, F. Apisa. The rambling, often incoherent Sarah Palin is still attractive to men and dalehileman subconsciously might be meshing her physical assets with her somewhat limited mental skills.


I have mentioned before that I would do here in a New York minute.

But "smart" and "articulate?"
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  4  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 07:05 pm
@dalehileman,
dalehileman wrote:

Quote:
Dale...I have to ask: Are you being sarcastic here?
Frank I'd say provocative

Quote:
Smart! And articulate?
By my somewhat relaxed standards
Frank have you read her book


No...but I have heard her speak...and I cannot think of any way to use either "smart" or "articulate" to describe her...other than in a thought like, "She does not seem particularly smart or articulate to me."
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 07:10 pm
Don't forget, somebody as dumb as her recently served two terms.
roger
 
  3  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 07:39 pm
@edgarblythe,
She quit in the middle of her last term.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 07:51 pm
@roger,
To become the messiah of the tea party. And what did we get? Another devil in sheep's clothing - many men have fallen for her.
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 09:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The tone of her voice turns me off.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Jan, 2015 09:45 pm
@edgarblythe,
Some people like fingernails on a blackboard.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Mon 26 Jan, 2015 10:55 am
Wasn't Ted Cruz born in Canada?
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jan, 2015 01:46 am
The good part is that, Palin running may bring Tina Fey back to SNL.

Although I saw a news clip earlier tonight of Palin speaking about something or other--she was so incoherent, I couldn't tell what the topic was. She might not need Fey to parody her now, she's already acting, and sounding, like a parody of herself.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jan, 2015 11:41 pm
@firefly,
I would vote for her in the primary. I'd love to see her run for president.
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Thu 29 Jan, 2015 11:51 pm
@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:

I would vote for her in the primary. I'd love to see her run for president.


So would I The Democrats would be shoo-ins, wouldn't even need to campaign.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 12:03 am
@Lustig Andrei,
It'll become an important an important part of American history, and she will become a legend.
She'll end up getting what she pursued all her FAUX life.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 12:56 am
@Lustig Andrei,
Lustig Andrei wrote:
The Democrats would be shoo-ins, wouldn't even need to campaign.

Once upon a time, Democrats said the same thing about Ronald Reagan.

After the 2013 gun control debacle, the Republicans are going to win in 2016 no matter who they nominate.

And then a bunch of Liberal justices will retire from the Supreme Court, with their replacements being picked by the new Republican president.
Lustig Andrei
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2015 01:02 am
@oralloy,
You've said this before on other threads. Your opinion, for whatever it's worth, is duly noted. [Btw, I have absolutely no idea what "2013 gun control debacle" you're referring to and I strongly suspect that most voters have no idea what you're talking about either.]
 

Related Topics

The Joe Biden Thread - Discussion by edgarblythe
Star Wars legend Carrie Fisher dies at 60 - Discussion by maporsche
Best of 2016?* - Discussion by tsarstepan
Koch Brothers - Question by gollum
Movie attendance for 2016.... - Discussion by tsarstepan
Trump said, "most people don't deserve respect." - Question by cicerone imposter
A2K Fantasy Football 2016 - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/10/2021 at 03:10:20