1
   

Could early warning change the outcome of Pearl Harbor?

 
 
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 03:04 pm
How would Pearl Harbor have fared had they had left their radar on?

Men go to greater lengths to avoid what they fear than to obtain what they desire Dan Brown
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 1 • Views: 412 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 03:12 pm
Radar was very new in 1941 for the US military. Operators did spot something approaching and phoned their superiors but were told "don't worry about it". Have you actually read any of the history of Pearl Harbor?

0 Replies
 
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 03:59 pm
@Rickoshay75,
Early warning of whatever kind -- providing it was taken seriously and acted upon -- could have minimized the damage done by the Japanese attack and enabled the US to inflict more damage on the attackers, That said, I don't see that it would have changed one single thing in the days and years to come. FDR would still have gone to Congress the next day with his 'day of infamy' speech, WW II would have progressed in just the same manner and the 'future' would not have been changed,

However, some lives might have been saved.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Sun 18 Jan, 2015 04:35 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
All done on purpose and by design! Very easy to proof!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Could early warning change the outcome of Pearl Harbor?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.22 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 12:24:26