I'm essentially repeating what I said in an earlier post...
I've been ignoring this thread because "whitebars" seems like such an obvious parody, or caricature, of a feminist, written by an anti-feminist, for the sole purpose of ridiculing, mocking, and distorting, modern feminist views, and generating negative feelings for feminists.
All the proper alleged "feminist" code words/cliches, and perceptions, and positions are there in whitebars' posts, but it's all absurd and very over-the-top--real people, including feminist school teachers, don't talk this way, or even think this way, when discussing a 7 year old first grade student, and one with a master's degree in gender studies would never ask ,"Was I assaulted," if that child touched her breast while she was extricating him from some play equipment, or dub him a budding misogynist who might well grow up to be a rapist.
This is satire, created by some anti-feminist, who isn't even very familiar with modern feminism, and I can't believe how many here have swallowed the bait, hook, line, and sinker.
I'd never heard of Operation Lollipop until engineer mentioned it. This thread, and the creation of whitebars, as an alleged feminist, seems to definitely fall within that category. Other than the diehard men's rights activists, who are obsessed with trying to attack and discredit feminism, I can't imagine who would want to engage in this sort of nonsense, creating a parody, a negative caricature, and trying to pass it off as an actual person allegedly seeking advice.
whitebars posts are so cliché ridden they read like a Saturday Night Live sketch trying to mock feminism. Real people do not speak exclusively in clichés or slogans or ideological comments. And real people seeking advice don't launch into an ideological polemic to promote their views.
Nothing about whitebars rings true at all...