Are there any peaceful muslim nations?

Judaism does not condemn non-Jews to hell. It is not concerned with the afterlife for most non-Jews because it is the religion for Jews.

portal,

Can u show me the verses from the Quran where it is so violent? The ones u are talking about on this post. I want to see that you make statements with its evidence. Or else, everyone should believe me when I say I ate breakfast with Elvis at my home.

Malta is NOT a muslim nation--that is the muslims do not run the country. They are not in charge.

Can u show me the verses from the Quran where it is so violent? The ones u are talking about on this post. I want to see that you make statements with its evidence. Or else, everyone should believe me when I say I ate breakfast with Elvis at my home.

No, it's not true, and that's the point of my response, which is not fallacious.

What is fallacious is your hateful bigotry to the effect that Muslim scripture makes Muslims violent.

Despite the web address - this site deals with explaining how Islams three holy books work together, and the violent inclinations in them

Shari'a generated debate and concern during 2004, and many of the issues raised touched on religious freedom. Aceh remained the only part of the country where the central Government specifically authorized Shari'a. Law 18/2001 granted Aceh special autonomy and included authority for Aceh to establish a system of Shari'a as an adjunct to, not a replacement for, national civil and criminal law. Before it could take effect, the law required the provincial legislature to approve local regulations ("qanun") incorporating Shari'a precepts into the legal code. Law 18/2001 states that the Shari'a courts would be "free from outside influence by any side." Article 25(3) states that the authority of the court will only apply to Muslims. Article 26(2) names the national Supreme Court as the court of appeal for Aceh's Shari'a courts.

Aceh is the only province that has Shari'a courts. Religious leaders responsible for drafting and implementing the Shari'a regulations stated that they had no plans to apply criminal sanctions for violations of Shari'a. Islamic law in Aceh, they said, would not provide for strict enforcement of fiqh or hudud, but rather would codify traditional Acehnese Islamic practice and values such as discipline, honesty, and proper behavior. They claimed enforcement would not depend on the police but rather on public education and societal consensus.

This was your claim, and if one can say that Islam has violent inclinations because of it's scripture, it is completely reasonable, and not fallacious to point the same thing out about Christianity. It's hardly my fault that you can't see how you let yourself open to that criticism.

Virtually every complaint you make is ipse dixit, just claims you make without substantiation. A good example is you throwinug out that 10% of Muslim this or that horseshit--got some substantiation for your claim?

http://www.pewglobal.org/2011/07/21/chapter-3-islamic-extremism/

Please tell in what countries civil war rages now as a result of a preponderance of Muslims.

The abuse of women, including rape, is hardly an area in which one can reasonably claim that Islam is uniquely repressive. What do you think the Christian Serbs were doing to the Muslim Bosnia women with their rape camps?

Christianity is seven hundred years older than Islam. Shall we discuss how Christians behaved seven hundred years ago?

I won't be responding to you again. I consider you a disgusting and hateful bigot.

I would also point out that where muslims gain a sufficient foothold, they often try to impose sharia law

So Shari'a is not universal in the nation in which more than one in eight Muslims live, and in the one area in which Shari'a is recognized, it has no civil enforcement, and does not supplant the civil code.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_countries_use_Sharia_Law

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/features/3718799/London-suburb-put-under-Sharia-law.html

Islamists want to influence the laws of the state. When using the term Islamist, Muslims refer almost exclusively to those whose program is to establish an Islamic state. There are many more movements to establish such states than are recognized as Islamist by the West, thus the use is not very uniform.

This is not to say that Islamist groups advocate violent takeover in every political environment, they might simply advocate Sharia Law. Because influence in French politics is possible without resorting to violence, the use of violence in that context is considered counterproductive toward achieving their goal of guiding the political system according to the principles of Islam.

The political aim of Islamists is ultimately the formal establishment of Sharia law, with or without modern adaptations. Fundamentalism and traditionalism, of themselves, do not have this specific political connotation at all. Islamists are deemed such according to their adherence to the political goal of an Islamic state, rather than by features of their religious observance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_France