0
   

2004 Elections: Democratic Party Contenders

 
 
Italgato
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 05:49 pm
Statements of Faith:

Here is mine.

The attack on the WTC was caused by the posture taken by President Clinton when he ordered the bombing of Baghdad in December 1998.

My statement is just as valid as Mr. Pistoff's blurb.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 05:53 pm
hobit

Blame must be apportioned out to my brothers. They both moved from teaching to administration, thus are doubly at fault. I, on the other hand, moved from my degree to a small artisan business, thus am responsible only for a lot of closet doors that don't close properly and light fixtures that rattle when butterflies in Asia wing heavily.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 06:14 pm
I hate it when the closet doors stick! Wink
0 Replies
 
Suzette
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 06:22 pm
Just shows to go you!

I was right all along in sticking with Blatham.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It isn't and won't be only Iraqis or some other country's people being maimed &/or killed; the economy does and will continue to suck; if Clinton's bombing of 12/98 caused 9/11/01, then what caused WTC 2/93?...I mean this goes on and on and never changes except we grow closer to the end Mad .

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Either one, educational or the U.S., administration indeed equals death.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 06:29 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Well, "89" is a NATO code for reading between the lines.
"Divi" is Latin, meaning 'divide', and "de" is the national sign for Germany.


But I thought Germany was united again in 89! Razz

(Well, the first step towards it anyway etc - dont let formalities get in the way of a joke)
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 06:39 pm
don't let ANYTHING get in the way of a joke
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:03 pm
especially those that fall flat......
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:24 pm
i usually make pancakes outa those ...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:28 pm
I have a joke.

What is orange and crawls along the ground?


(a wounded cheesy)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:33 pm
Bernie cut the cheese?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:40 pm
Perhaps I was imprudent to start after all.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:45 pm
Correction
I posted two paragraphs. :wink:

My views could be incorrect or correct. Only future events shall provide which.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 07:54 pm
Mr Hinteler wrote:
Don't believe him, suzette! There are several political novices here as well, like .... what was his/her name


Oh, yeah, I think I know who ya mean ... wasn't that the one that got eaten the other week, Walter? Horrible mess.

I sorted out that "89" thing, too.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 08:22 pm
If you were a bookie ...

A new thread: http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=15110
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 08:35 pm
Here's some bright news for the Dems: With 4% of precincts (178 out of 4149) reporting, Blanco leads Jindal 53-47. Wooley, the Dem Lt. Governor candidate, is leading Republican Kyle by an impressive 58-42. Perhaps the Republicans can be held to just 3 out of 4 ... that would be encouraging to some.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 08:38 pm
actually Timber, from the politics they have advanced, I can't tell the difference between them.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 08:45 pm
They're up to 1109 out of 4143 now, and its Blanco over Jindal by 54-46, indicating Blanco is widening the lead.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 09:38 pm
Timber noted that:

timberlandko wrote:
there is no denying a tilt toward the Republican Party by The Electorate. [..] With Republican victories in three of this year's four gubernatorial contests, and a fourth GOP pickup, in Louisiana this weekend likely, have decidedly tipped the balance of Statehouses in Republican favor since 2000. [..] The future is a matter of conjecture, but the ddds, as demonstrated by clearly evident and well established trend momentum, mitigate against Democrat success.


And Italgato added that:

Italgato wrote:
Anyone who knows the basics of politics knows that the governorships are vital in setting the stage for winning majorities for their candidates. At this time, the Republicans control 29 governorships while the Democrats control only 21. [..] In summation, it is clear that [..] there is no backlash or voter fury aimed at Republicans.


But MSNBC notes that:

Quote:
In the 41 governors races since November 2001, there have been 25 switches in party control: 12 have switched from Republican to Democrat, while 11 have gone the other way. (The other two were independent-held seats, one going Republican and the other Democratic.) [Cook Political Report analyst] Duffy says this proves one party isn’t really dominating — rather, what we’re really seeing is change.


As for the national political relevance of the Louisiana race, another MSNBC item remarks that:

Quote:
This time around, the election has generated less excitement, with rallies sometimes drawing sparse crowds.
Part of the problem is voters have a hard time telling the candidates apart politically, Secretary of State Fox McKeithen said. During the primary in particular, each offered similar stances on economic development, education and health care.
“Basically, they agree on everything, and it’s just, ’I did it better than you did it.’ People are just not excited about these candidates,” McKeithen said.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 09:54 pm
damn, I hate it when real facts enter the political agenda.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Nov, 2003 10:01 pm
all depends on from when you start counting <shrugs>

here's an interesting new poll: on gun control laws. should they be more strict, less strict, or stay the same?

40% of republicans, 48% of independents and 65% of democrats want stricter gun laws.

44% of republicans, 36% of independents and 27% of democrats want them to stay the same.

14% of republicans, 12% of independents and 4% of democrats want less strict gun laws.

see http://www.pollingreport.com/

oh - latest few polls there arent good for the dem presidential candidates, especially not for dean (there goes my theory)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 06/26/2025 at 09:17:01