California adopts 'yes means yes' sexual assault rule

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/10/californias-radical-college-sex-law-experiment.html

Men can now be run through the sword of the law anytime women that they have sex with want to b e run through , for what ever reason they might want to have us run through. This is not an accident, this is the feminist program to keep men in line, to ultimately force us to submit to women. THis is the program that the government has signed up to run.

Will it fail? Of course. In the end the state will pay for this abuse of nearly half of its citizens.

Does mental illness have any meaning if the majority of people are deemed to be mentally ill?

Does criminality have any meaning if the majority of people are deemed to be criminals?

I think not.

Overly wide definitions cheapen monikers into irrelevance.

"YOU SIR ARE A RAPIST!"

My response: "Of course, now lets go hang the state for this abuse of its citizens!"

Hawkeye, I can see this kind of silliness if it ever can be enforce as ending casual sex between men and women, in fact taking away the freedom to have casual sex for both men and women.

What male no matter how driven by his hormones is going to be willing to place his future in the hands of a woman he does not know and trust when she had the power to label him a rapist at her whim?

As I had written before being married to a stable and mature woman I am safe but lord I am concern for my young grandsons.

This silliness serve neither men or women.

One small bright spot is that as in the military bringing charges under these new standards is not hard but getting convictions by jurors is proving a hard task indeed as one court martial after another are refusing to convict under those standards with the court martial conviction rates going sharply down.