13
   

God's Presence on Earth through His Spirit (Scripture & Photos Examined)

 
 
timur
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:38 pm
@Smileyrius,
Patches is so dumb that you need to explain him what he writes..
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:47 pm
@timur,
It is I who has to explain it to you. It is a battle against good (God and His kingdom) and evil (Satan and his kingdom). By the way, I am part of God's kingdom.
Smileyrius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:50 pm
@Patches,
The correct expression would be between good and evil my friend.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:51 pm
I gotta keep reminding myself that you guys are actually serious.





https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTduy3KV3MkOidbCyZwOkTesU1R_IX-tiLkpofwL888-dtpym6c
0 Replies
 
timur
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 01:52 pm
@Patches,
How can you explain something if you don't even know how to write?

Where I live there's no kingdom and I've no god.

I live healthy, happy and free from your lousy notions.

Patches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 02:20 pm
@timur,
If you believe that you have no kingdom nor god, than you turn down God's grace and yours is the kingdom of evil and your God is Lucifer. You are the devil and will serve your master for all of eternity.
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 02:22 pm
@Smileyrius,
Consult an English teacher. The battle against good and evil would be correct.
timur
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 02:23 pm
@Patches,
Sure not, o dumb one!

I certainly do more good to the humankind than all your crazy preaching.
0 Replies
 
timur
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 02:25 pm
@Patches,
I know for a fact that this forum comprises quite a lot of finely educated people in English language matters.

Let's wait that one of them shows up to prove you wrong.
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 02:40 pm
@Patches,
Patches wrote:
Consult an English teacher. The battle against good and evil would be correct.
Kindly explain the moral identity of those against good and evil. Would that be 'neutral'? Or, how would you describe neither good nor evil?

I am beginning to wonder. . .
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 03:00 pm
@neologist,
There is no one against good and evil. It is a battle against good and evil. Even you should be able to understand the simplicity of that.
0 Replies
 
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 04:41 pm
@timur,
Fat chance. You need to go back to school.
0 Replies
 
Smileyrius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Oct, 2014 05:01 pm
@Patches,
Perhaps you are right, perhaps, it certainly isn't fruitful to quibble over grammar. I understand your point.

You speak of the one called Satan as having a kingdom, over what domain do you understand his kingship to be?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 01:38 am
@Smileyrius,
Smileyrius wrote:

The correct expression would be between good and evil my friend.


Yes, if you had to use against you could say. It is a battle of good against evil, or good versus evil. I just posted this on another thread, and it seems entirely germane to this conversation.


Whoever went to the effort of compiling the video got it spot on.
0 Replies
 
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 06:20 am
@Smileyrius,
His name is Lucifer and he rules over the kingdom of hell (evil).
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 09:22 am
@Patches,
Lucifer is not a person.
If you wish to refer to Satan, his kingdom is currently the earth.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 09:45 am
@neologist,
Lucifers.
http://www.ccsutlery.com/store/media/productimages/PersonalItems/LucifersMatchesCCSutlery_SM.jpg
0 Replies
 
Patches
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 09:47 am
@neologist,
His name is Lucifer and his kingdom is in the invisible spirit world on earth called, the Netherworld.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 10:05 am
They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.

They're really serious.
Smileyrius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 15 Oct, 2014 10:22 am
@Patches,
Which Hell do you suppose would he reside over? of the words rendered Hell in the king james version you have 3 original translations, two of which were nouns and one was a verb,

You have Sheol (hebrew) / Hades (Greek), the common grave into which both the unrighteous and the righteous go

Or perhaps you mean Gehenna, the valley outside of Jerusalem which burned with sulphur, it was known to the locals as a place to which unwanted rubbish along with the bodies of criminals deemed undeserving of a proper burial would tossed out to be consumed.

Tartaroo on the other hand which is often mistranslated as Tartarus, is a verb, that is, the process of being imprisoned, restrained, degraded, etc. Tartarus was a place in Hellenistic mythology and had no place in early Christian teachings. The modern day imagery and description of Hell appears to be derived from Tartarus, which has no mention in scripture, short of a number of doctrinally led mistranslations
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/19/2025 at 11:45:29