@hawkeye10,
No you're not, but what does that matter other than as an expression of your reaction to this matter? Are you suggesting that the State should mandate a belief in redemption? Should employers be forced to give employees a second chance?
It's a simple matter. Rice's behavior harmed the NFL, and his continued "employment" will harm it further. Your belief in redemption is irrelevant.
An action doesn't have to meet each and every person's definition of the word to be "fair," and since there is a contract involved, to which Rice freely agreed, that permits the NFL to "ban" him for certain behaviors it's quite equitable as well.
It's a tough argument to make that society will benefit so much from Rice being given a "second chance" that a legal contract should be rendered unenforceable.
And all the blather about Corporate America and Capital is just that. There's a decent chance that there is an entity termed something like Ray Rice Inc. And anyone making $22 million is a personification of "Capital." Rice was represented by an agent and lawyers who if not part of actual corporations, were certainly involved in "big business"
In business deals it is very often the case that one party has greater leverage than the other, one party needs the other more than the other needs them. If you're on the short end of this imbalance you accept terms and conditions that are more favorable to the other party than yourself, or you don't make the deal. It's the way business has worked for millennia and there is nothing legally or morally wrong with it.
If someone doesn't want their personal life to make a difference in their professional life then they need be selective in the profession they choose.