40
   

The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

 
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 01:43 pm
Here is a strange turn of events considering the SPLC is egging on this racial unrest. Media quiet on this too.
Quote:
LOL: SPLC Writer Murdered by Blacks While Hiking

Quote:
Ruenzel had been writing for the SPLC going as far back as 1996 – way before it was cool among the hip young kiddies to hate yourself because you’re White and demand Black people be put in authoritarian positions of power over you.

Here’s a fun question: if these Blacks had known that Ruenzel was an ardent supporter of their right to “be equal” with Whites, would they still have shot him and left him bleeding to death in the woods? Would even an “anti-racist” be able to argue that if they had known he was “on their side” they wouldn’t have slaughtered him like an animal?

This murder is one of the best real life example’s I have ever seen of what is commonly called “poetic justice.”

It is notable that the SPLC itself has not published a single word on the killing. They are an organization allegedly devoted to “fighting racial hatred,” yet a man who took part in their own operations is murdered in an act of racial hatred, and they don’t even bother to comment on it.


http://www.dailystormer.com/lol-splc-writer-murdered-by-blacks-while-hiking/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 03:58 pm
@giujohn,
Goojohn, nothing like that has ever happened in my life -I'm white privileged, ya know.But you! You seem to be extremely familiar with your little scenario. So are you sober yet. Are you still snitching for your local constabulary? When you fried your brain, was there even a brain in there to fry? Still taking Ritalin, twerp?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:04 pm
SFPD Cops Attack Innocent Man, Neighbors Beaten For Helping
Posted on: November 19th, 2013 9 Comments
Tagged with:law abuse, police beating, san francisco police, usa police



The heartwarming story about citizens of San Francisco making 5-year-old leukemia survivor Miles Scott’s dream come true couldn’t go without SFPD casting a dark shadow on the whole event. A black cyclist was beaten up after riding home from the Make A Wish Foundation happening for carrying what turned out to be a cupcake and juice.

21-year-old D’Paris Williams, known as DJ, was riding his bicycle and pulling up to his home at Valencia Gardens Apartments in Mission District. Two undercover cops in an unmarked vehicle got out of the car and grabbed DJ from behind, suspecting that he was carrying drugs.

It is still unclear whether they identified themselves as police officers before charging at DJ or not, but they went on to search him. The only thing they found was a cupcake and juice DJ had just bought at the corner store, but this didn’t stop them from beating the young black man.

One of the cops shoved DJ’s head into the building’s front door, then dragged him in the street where he was beaten until he blacked out. His sister, holding a newborn in her arms, was pushed by the second officer when she tried to intervene.

Several neighbors came to the rescue trying to make the cops stop, which resulted in three more people beaten by the police and taken in. One part of the incident was caught on tape and it shows the undercover cop running to a man and punching him in the face several times.

The man is later seen with a bloodied face, taken away in handcuffs. Police also arrested a man with HIV whose medical condition requires that he walks with a cane, considering the cane ‘a deadly weapon’.

DJ was taken to General Hospital for treatment, and then to the police station on Bryant Street. It is yet unknown if any charges will be pressed against him.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:06 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Here's the tape and photos:

0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:11 pm
Deputy Lets a Female Prisoner Escape in Exchange For Sex
Posted on: December 15th, 2011 3 Comments
Tagged with:law abuse, tusco police, usa police

Dale L. Tompkins, a 41-year-old former Sheriff’s Department deputy of Tuscola County, was sentenced to 185 days in jail for having sex with a female prisoner on the hood of his police cruiser. He accepted the prisoner’s offer to have sex with her in exchange for letting her go, which are felonies of accepting a bribe and voluntarily letting a prisoner escape punishable with up to 15 years in prison, so getting away with just 6 months behind bars was a pretty good deal for Tompkins.

The event occurred when the woman was arrested in Genessee County on account of a probation violation in Tuscola County, and was handed over to Tompkins to be transported to a jail in Caro. Thanks to the bribe loving cop, she never made it there.

During the ride, the woman offered Tompkins to have sex with him if he lets her escape, and he agreed, receiving oral sex and having intercourse with her on the hood of the car. Tompkins kept his part of the deal and let the woman run away.

While his sentence seems pretty short for a crime of this sort, it’s comforting to know that after being a convicted felon Tompkins won’t be able to work as a police officer in Michigan ever again.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:13 pm

NYC Cops Use Hate Speech Against Minorities on Facebook
Posted on: December 9th, 2011 10 Comments
Tagged with:hate speech, nypd, police on facebook, police racism, usa police

nypd on facebook
A gun possession trial accidentally revealed the existence of a Facebook group where the NYC police officers blatantly used hate speech directed against minorities. The racist comments were made mostly about the West Indian American Day Parade and its participants being called “savages” and “animals” that should be left to kill each other.

Benjamin Moore, a lawyer preparing for the defense of one of his clients, searched Facebook for the profile of a police officer who arrested him.

Browsing his profile, a group that Sgt. Dustin Edwards was a member of called “No More West Indian Day Detail” caught his eye.

After reading about 70 printed pages of conversation on the group’s wall, Moore could hardly believe some of the things he read.

One of the members, for example, wrote “I say have the parade one more year and when they all gather drop a bomb and wipe them all out”, but that wasn’t the end of highly offensive and racist comments towards the parade goers.

What was even more shocking is that more than 60% of group members’ names matched the names of people working in the NYC police department.

A couple of days after Moore found the group it vanished from Facebook, but he made a digital copy of it earlier. While it’s hard to prove that these profiles actually belong to NYC police officers and all cops so far have denied it, it’s still a shame to know that many people in the force are racially biased.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:30 pm
Missouri AG Confirms Michael Brown Grand Jury Misled by St. Louis DA
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/12/04/1349421/-Missouri-AG-Confirms-Michael-Brown-Grand-Jury-Misled-by-St-Louis-DA?detail=email#

Subsequent to a previous report from Lawrence O'Donnell the Missouri Attorney General has confirmed with Last Word that they instructions given the Michael Brown Grand Jury describing the Police "use of force" laws was incorrect and misleading.

The background of this situation is that Lawrence O'Donnell reported that after reviewing the transcripts of the Darren Wilson Grand Jury, his analyst discovered that Assistant District Attorney's working for Bob McCullough gave the Jurors an outdated copy of Missouri Law that all that was required for an Officer to use deadly force is their "reasonable belief" that there was a threat.

In 1985 the Supreme Court amended this law to include a "probable cause" requirement under Tennessee v Garner and the Jury wasn't informed of this until 3 months later just before their deliberations, nor even at that time was the difference and relevance of this explained to them clearly.

The misleading information was given to the Grand Jury directly before Darren Wilson's testimony giving the impression that all that was required under the law for Wilson to kill Michael Brown was his belief that he was in danger, without the additional requirement of probable cause for such a belief.

The Missouri AG now proclaims that was wrong and the Missouri Law needs to be changed and updated to reflect the Supreme Court's ruling.

-----------

So what is the MO Attorney General prepared to do about it?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:53 pm
dryfeed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 04:55 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
bobsal: A couple of days after Moore found the group it vanished from Facebook, but he made a digital copy of it earlier. While it’s hard to prove that these profiles actually belong to NYC police officers and all cops so far have denied it, it’s still a shame to know that many people in the force are racially biased.

--------------------------------

Isn't the NSA/FBI interested in locating terrorists on the internet?
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 05:01 pm
@dryfeed,
You'd think and the big secret is that all these big sweeps internationally of pedophiles have come out of NSA intercepts that were given to different police jurisdictions.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 05:06 pm
Cop Who Killed Eric Garner been sued three times for allegedly violating constitutional rights


NEW YORK — The white New York City police officer whose choke hold led to the death of an unarmed black man has been sued three times for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of other blacks he and fellow cops arrested.

A grand jury decision not to indict Daniel Pantaleo on Wednesday in the death of Eric Garner, 43, the man he wrestled to the ground during an attempted arrest for selling untaxed cigarettes on a Staten Island sidewalk in July, sparked waves of angry though largely peaceful demonstrations in several cities.


Officer's intent critical for grand jury in choke-hold case


The Garner case wasn't the first time Pantaleo, 29, was accused of misconduct, however.

Darren Collins and Tommy Rice alleged in a 2013 federal court lawsuit that Pantaleo and at least four other officers subjected them to "humiliating and unlawful strip searches in public view" after handcuffing them during a March 2012 arrest on Staten Island.



http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/12/04/choke-hold-cop-pantaleo-sued/19899461/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 05:08 pm
Officer Tried to Have Oral Intercourse With 12-year-old Orphaned Boy
Posted on: February 11th, 2009 8 Comments
Tagged with:police abuse, police sex crime, usa police

http://www.policebrutality.info/content/uploads/2009/02/12-year-old-boy.jpg

A NY police sergeant, Jamie Katz (39) was accused of trying to make an orphaned 12-year-old boy have oral sex with him. Katz faced other sex abuse charges like having sex with the same boy in several places and during family vacations for six years. The boy’s mother knew Katz, and after she passed away, he and his older brother were adopted by one of Katz’s relatives. Katz resigned from the police force where he had been an officer for 10 years and the former head of the Gay Officers Action League.

He admitted that he tried to have sex with the 12-year-old without the need of the victim’s testify. Katz will spend 5 years in prison, 10 years under supervised release, and 20 years on the New York State Sex Offender Registry.
0 Replies
 
giujohn
 
  0  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2014 06:14 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Goojohn, nothing like that has ever happened in my life -I'm white privileged, ya know.But you! You seem to be extremely familiar with your little scenario. So are you sober yet. Are you still snitching for your local constabulary? When you fried your brain, was there even a brain in there to fry? Still taking Ritalin, twerp?


LOL
My only response to this has to be...I know you are but what am I ?!!! (nanner, nanner)
LOL
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 06:47 am
@giujohn,
Says the guy that started it. Goldfish have longer attention spans than you. Go **** yourself, junior.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 06:49 am
Police Shoot, Kill Man With Pocket Knife Near Hollywood Walk of Fame
Source: NBC-LA

http://i57.tinypic.com/hvyr60.jpg

A man with a combination pocket knife was shot and killed by police Friday night near the Hollywood Walk of Fame, police said. Police responded to reports of a man with a deadly weapon at Hollywood Boulevard and Highland Avenue just before 7 p.m., police said. Officers fired after seeing the man approach them while armed with a knife, said Meghan Aguilar of the LAPD. The man died in the hospital before 9:30 p.m.

A combination knife, similar to a Swiss Army Knife, was found at the scene. <snip> One woman said a man ran into a McDonald's shouting that police shot his friend, who sometimes "liked to wave a knife to scare tourists."

(pocket knife w/corkscrew from video at link)




Read more: http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/hollywood-highland-shooting-report-284945511.html

0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 06:56 am
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 07:25 am
Why did police kill black teen Cameron Tillman?
This happened in Sept:
"A 14-year-old Louisiana boy is dead after he was fatally shot by a Terrebonne Parish deputy Tuesday night in Houma, La., WWL TV reports.

According to the report, Louisiana State Police are involved in the investigation of the shooting. Louisiana State Police Trooper Evan Harrell told reporters that it is still unclear what happened, but he did confirm that the young boy, Cameron Tillman, was killed in the shooting. Harrell also added that some type of weapon was recovered "in close proximity" to the boy's body, according to the news site.

"We actually took over the investigation due to the officer-involved shooting," Harrell added. "What transpired on the scene is being processed right now ... and we ask everybody to not make snap-judgment calls because we want to do a very thorough investigation because the officer and the 14-year-old deserve a thorough investigation."


http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/09/_14_year_old_louisiana_boy_fatally_shot_by_police.html?wpisrc=obinsite
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 07:47 am
@bobsal u1553115,
What is wrong with these police officers? Has this always been going on? It is like they have run amok. What would possess a police officer to trip and punch a pregnant woman? How is that any way justified?
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 07:59 am
Getting back to subject at hand, or attempting to:

Shadow Trial




Quote:
St. Louis County prosecutor Robert McCulloch’s decision to “open up” the grand jury proceedings by including massive amounts of testimony and evidence has been decried as “highly unusual,” “deeply unfair,” and evidence that police officer Darren Wilson received “special treatment.” McCulloch’s move to include a good deal of exculpatory evidence and testimony led to a three-month, closed-door proceeding that included 70 hours of testimony, including 60 witnesses and three medical examiners. The breadth of the evidence presented to the grand jury has led many to declare that it turned the entire proceeding into something that walks and quacks an awful lot like a trial, but without many of the procedural rules that would make a trial truly fair.


This move to morph a grand jury inquiry, which is typically a short rundown of the case for the prosecution, into a trial-like parade of mountains of evidence raises serious issues about the rights of Michael Brown’s family to have a fair process for their dead son, as well as highlighting concerns about unequal treatment of different kinds of criminal defendants. But seemingly lost in this jumble of legal concerns is the fact that McCulloch’s decision to shift the truth-seeking function of a criminal trial into the secret realm of the grand jury room violated another set of constitutional rights—ours. It violated our collective public right to an open criminal justice system. And if ever there was a trial to which Americans deserved a meaningful right of access, Wilson’s trial was it. Instead, we have a post-hoc document dump.


In the 1980 case of Richmond Newspapers v. Virginia, the Supreme Court declared that the press and public have a First Amendment right of access to criminal trials. In the words of Justice William Brennan, “Open trials are bulwarks of our free and democratic government: Public access to court proceedings is one of the numerous ‘checks and balances’ of our system, because ‘contemporaneous review in the forum of public opinion is an effective restraint on possible abuse of judicial power.’ ”

This right of open trials belongs not just to the accused but to all of us. It is, the Supreme Court said in the 1986 case Press Enterprise v. Superior Court, “a shared right of the accused and the public, the common concern being the assurance of fairness.” And while those accused of crimes have a constitutional right to a “speedy and open trial,” they do not, the court has said, have a right to a private trial.


In discussing the history and need for open trials roughly three decades ago, it was as if the court were imagining this week’s situation in Ferguson rather specifically. The community at large has a massive stake in the criminal justice process, the court said. Whether it is to make sure an innocent person is not imprisoned or a guilty one is not allowed to walk free, “the conduct of the trial is preeminently a matter of public interest.” Think about the closed doors in Ferguson these past months as you reflect on what Chief Justice Warren Burger famously explained: “When a shocking crime occurs, a community reaction of outrage and public protest often follows. Thereafter the open processes of justice serve an important prophylactic purpose, providing an outlet for community concern, hostility, and emotion.”


The fact that 12 jurors witnessed the proceedings in St. Louis does not cure the constitutional violation. While jurors can function as surrogates for the public and a check on government misfeasance, the court affirmed in Richmond Newspapers that by impaneling a jury, the community did “not surrender its right to observe the conduct of trials” or its ability “to satisfy themselves that justice was in fact being done.” Disclosing results alone, the court declared, will not “satiate the natural community desire for ‘satisfaction,’ ” and “an unexpected outcome can cause a reaction that the system at best has failed and at worst has been corrupted.”


While the Supreme Court has never declared a right of access to grand jury proceedings, it has held that closure of pretrial proceedings that function like trials is unconstitutional. In Press Enterprise, for example, a 41-day probable-cause hearing was closed to the press and the public. Under California law, the probable-cause hearing was designed to determine whether the defendant could stand trial for the charges, much like in a grand jury proceeding. But, the court noted, the state process allowed broad introduction of evidence, meaning that it was “often the final and most important step in the criminal proceeding” and “the sole occasion for public observation of the criminal justice system.”


Closed trials have serious costs. Brennan told us that they “breed suspicion of prejudice and arbitrariness, which in turn spawns disrespect for law.” And Burger explained that “people in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing.” Furthermore, according to Burger, the “crucial prophylactic aspects of the administration of justice cannot function in the dark; no community catharsis can occur if justice is ‘done in a corner [or] in any covert manner.’ ” Yet that is precisely what this strange shadow trial from Ferguson became. It may as well have been “done in a corner.”


That secrecy was not cured in any way by the after-the-fact document dump with which the prosecutors’ office released the materials considered by the grand jury. Certainly giving all of us access to the materials created the appearance of a wholly transparent and open process. But it seems to have had largely the effect of reinforcing people’s beliefs. Michael Brown’s supporters insist he was an unarmed kid, killed by a trigger happy white cop, and Wilson’s supporters insist he was justifiably defending himself from an animal who was poised to kill him. By dumping all of the evidence and allowing us to arrive at our own conclusions, absent any context or process or ability to judge the credibility of witnesses, we have been handed the criminal equivalent of one of those choose-your-own-adventure books, in which we can all find an interpretation that conforms to our pre-existing ideas.


In the end, we all got to bear witness not to a fair and open trial, but to parts of it that do not add up to openness, fairness, or justice. We cannot believe in the fairness of a process we cannot see, and we should not be led to believe in the fairness of a process because a prosecutor’s office asserts that we have seen all we need to.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 6 Dec, 2014 10:24 am
@revelette2,
Quote:
Getting back to subject at hand, or attempting to:


LOL let be honest as far as you are concern any outcome that does not end with officer Wilson spending a large percent of his remaining lifespan behind bars would be unfair to you.

If would not matter if officer Wilson was clear at the trial level or the GJ level.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 06/16/2024 at 11:08:55