"he is defective so nothing he says matters" is a common tactic here to deal with points of view that can not be challenged with facts or evidence. Of course getting us "defectives" thrown out would be even better.
Good old ad-hominem attacks and of course emotions are easier to drum up when is come to the idea of harming children while good old Izzy in fact have no problem with harming children using the very laws that was suppose to protect them against them.
When you're right you're right...I stand corrected sir.
So the question is: what is MORE worthless than BooB? I just dont know.
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 10:37 pm
Drownings along Rio Grande spike after enforcement surge
Source: Associated Press
Drownings along Rio Grande spike after enforcement surge
By SETH ROBBINS, Associated Press | March 29, 2015 | Updated: March 29, 2015 4:54pm
MISSION, Texas (AP) — A U.S. surveillance helicopter hovering over the Rio Grande spots a body floating near a muddy bank on the Mexican side of the river.
Soon another body turns up, then another. A Mexican investigator arrives and holds up his hand confirming the grim tally: four men and a woman.
The grisly discovery last month is part of a spike in drownings since October. Immigrants, desperate to avoid detection at a time of increased patrols, are choosing more dangerous and remote crossings into South Texas. The Border Patrol has responded by expanding its search-and-rescue teams to monitor the area, particularly weed-choked irrigation canals where many of the bodies are being found.
"The canals and areas of the river they are trying to traverse, they typically weren't trying to go across before," said Raul L. Ortiz, deputy chief of Rio Grande Valley sector.
Drownings along Rio Grande spike after enforcement surge
good, it will discourage the practice.
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 10:49 pm
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 10:52 pm
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 10:53 pm
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 10:56 pm
0 Replies
coldjoint
-4
Reply
Sun 29 Mar, 2015 11:09 pm
Non stop spam again.
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Mon 30 Mar, 2015 06:55 am
0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
1
Reply
Mon 30 Mar, 2015 07:03 am
Lisa Mearkle: Hummelstown Police Officer That Fatally Shot Unarmed Man Faces Homicide Charges
Subscribe Free By Val Powell · March 26, 2015 · Leave a Comment
Pennsylvania VFW police service awardee Mearkle faces criminal homicide charges for shooting 59-year-old David Kassick twice in the back on February 2 without legal justification. The victim was facing down on the ground, incapacitated and unarmed.
Reports say that Mearkle had attempted to pull over Kassick for expired inspection and emissions stickers. Kassick sped away and led a chase to his sister’s home. Mearkle stunned Kassick as he ran and shot him dead.
The 36-year-old Mearkle told investigators that she shot the victim because he would not show her his hands.
Defense attorney Brian Perry cried foul on the charges.
“She felt like she had to do what she did,” Perry said. “This person was being commanded, begged, ‘show me your hands,’ and he kept going to his waist.”
According to district attorney Ed Marsico, the strongest evidence against Mearkle is the video from the stun gun the officer was carrying.
“At the time Officer Mearkle fires both rounds from her pistol, the video clearly depicts Kassick lying on the snow-covered lawn with his face toward the ground,” according to the arrest affidavit. “Furthermore, at the time the rounds are fired nothing can be seen in either of Kassick’s hands, nor does he point or direct anything toward Officer Mearkle.”
Hummelstown Police Officer Lisa Mearkle charged with criminal homicide of an unarmed man: http://t.co/yE1WDo3bn6 pic.twitter.com/TZ5KYHqDim
— WPMT FOX43 (@fox43) March 24, 2015
Investigators did not find a weapon on Kassick nor did they find any evidence pointing to a threat on Mearkle’s life during the shooting.
Hummelstown chief Charles Dowell has not yet commented on Mearkle’s case. The police department released a statement saying it had cooperated fully and called the case “an extremely difficult case for all involved”.
“We are servants of justice and must now allow the judicial process to conduct a fair and impartial review of the allegations that have been presented,” the news release stated.
Mearkle faces serious charges under the offense of criminal homicide including misdemeanor, involuntary manslaughter and first-degree murder.
Personally I wonder why certain words are accepted and others are not, these moderators live in a strange world. Having said that, who said he was complaining about anything? I am just glad for a change one of these police officers are actually being prosecuted.