2
   

Does "By the 17th century" mean "Before and including the 17th century"?

 
 
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2014 10:08 pm

Context:

Since classical antiquity, science as a type of knowledge has been closely linked to philosophy. In the early modern period the words "science" and "philosophy of nature" were sometimes used interchangeably.[4] By the 17th century, natural philosophy (which is today called "natural science") was considered a separate branch of philosophy.[5]
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 2 • Views: 496 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2014 10:14 pm
@oristarA,
I would translate it as "what has passed before.."
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2014 10:19 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

I would translate it as "what has passed before.."


Thanks.
I wonder whether natural philosophy (which is today called "natural science") was still considered a separate branch of philosophy in 17th century.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does "By the 17th century" mean "Before and including the 17th century"?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 04:34:47