10
   

how to describe/what is it called

 
 
WBYeats
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Jul, 2014 09:31 pm
Thank you~

If someone is wearing a mask, clearly in a state of sickness, can we say this to him?:

-Take care.
==============
What natural English can that person say in reply?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Jul, 2014 09:57 pm
@WBYeats,
Thanks//Thank you//I'm hanging in there//Thanks for your concern/kind thoughts
WBYeats
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2014 05:29 am
@JTT,
Thank you~

Quote:I'm hanging in there

Is it a humorous way of saying I'm on the verge of death? Someone would be hung!
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Jul, 2014 09:25 am
@WBYeats,
Not on the verge of death, WB, just coping.

Quote:
Someone would be hung!


(See definition 1b at,)

http://i.word.com/idictionary/hang

usage For both transitive and intransitive senses 1b the past and past participle hung, as well as hanged, is standard. Hanged is most appropriate for official executions <he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive … and his bowels torn out — Louis Allen> but hung is also used <gave orders that she should be hung — Peter Quennell>. Hung is more appropriate for less formal hangings <by morning I'll be hung in effigy — Ronald Reagan>.

WBYeats
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jul, 2014 08:10 pm
@JTT,
Thank you~
======================
eg Be careful with the washing powder; it might __ if not properly positioned.

I thought of SPILL OVER, but washing powder is not liquid. POUR OVER is wrong. What verb do I need?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jul, 2014 08:40 pm
@WBYeats,
SPILL will work.

SPILL OVER if you were say, pouring the contents of two boxes into one and you weren't paying close enough attention.

POUR OVER could see use if you were pouring it into a detergent cup or receptacle on the washer.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 12:53 am
@WBYeats,

Quote:
Someone would be hung!


Pictures are hung. People are hanged.
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 12:55 am
@WBYeats,
WBYeats wrote:

Thank you~
======================
eg Be cpareful with the washing powder; it might __ if not properly positioned.

I thought of SPILL OVER, but washing powder is not liquid. POUR OVER is wrong. What verb do I need?

Spill is fine. Any loose solid materials such as powders, grains, dust, sand, stones, small objects in bulk, etc, can behave like liquids and it is appropriate to use words like spill, flow, etc.
0 Replies
 
WBYeats
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 01:47 am
Thank you~

For Mctag, do you not think HUNG is less common but possible? I used HUNG because of the usage from A Study in Scarlet, Chap 1.
==========================
situation:

John has just made the acquaintance of an American student. When John knows this student, being a business major, has to take a literature course, he is surprised. Can he say these?:

-How come you have to take such a course? Literature is a far cry from business/Literature does not dovetail well with business/Literature doesn't sit well with business./Literature cuts no ice with business.
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 03:09 am
@WBYeats,
Quote:
For Mctag, do you not think HUNG is less common but possible?


Yes. The meaning is clear. And fewer native speakers seem to make the distinction nowadays. What does your dictionary say?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 03:15 am
@WBYeats,

Quote:
John has just made the acquaintance of an American student. When John knows this student, being a business major, has to take a literature course, he is surprised. Can he say these?:

-How come you have to take such a course? Literature is a far cry from business/Literature does not dovetail well with business/Literature doesn't sit well with business./Literature cuts no ice with business.


This is a jumble. "How come...?" is slang. This raises more questions than perhaps you are aware of. It reads like an exam question composed by a non-native speaker. I'd ignore it. Or maybe you'd like to re-state the question, to get the answer you're looking for.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 08:48 am
@McTag,
Quote:
Pictures are hung. People are hanged.


The idiot McTag can't even read.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 08:59 am
@WBYeats,
Quote:
John has just made the acquaintance of an American student. When John knows this student, being a business major, has to take a literature course, he is surprised. Can he say these?:

-How come you have to take such a course? Literature is a far cry from business/Literature does not dovetail well with business/Literature doesn't sit well with business./Literature cuts no ice with business.


Those are all possible, WB.

McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 09:11 am
@JTT,

Spiteful, then useless.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 09:28 am
@McTag,
It's not spiteful to point out that you can't even read what's in the thread.

---------------------------------------
(See definition 1b at,)

http://i.word.com/idictionary/hang

usage For both transitive and intransitive senses 1b the past and past participle hung, as well as hanged, is standard. Hanged is most appropriate for official executions <he was to be hanged, cut down whilst still alive … and his bowels torn out — Louis Allen> but hung is also used <gave orders that she should be hung — Peter Quennell>. Hung is more appropriate for less formal hangings <by morning I'll be hung in effigy — Ronald Reagan>.

-----------------------

What else could you be but an idiot for either truly missing it or pretending to miss it.

Then you did exactly what you like to accuse me of. It's a convenient way for an idiot like you to avoid discussing the language issues.








McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 10:29 am
@JTT,
Oh, a Ronald Reagan quotation used as a source. Now there's a novelty. What's next, Dubya?
I refer serious readers to my earlier remarks.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 10:36 am
@McTag,
Quote:
Oh, a Ronald Reagan post used as a source. Now there's a novelty. What's next, Dubya?


Now your problem becomes apparent, McTag. You don't have the ability to discern the material presented to you. And heaven forbid that you might actually go to the source to see what it was before you ignorantly, yet again, shoot your mouth off.

Or, what could equally be true, you are lying.

Quote:
I refer readers to my earlier remarks.


Which, need I point it out again, never contain anything addressing the language issues.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 11:51 am
@McTag,
Quote:
How come...?" is slang.


One might then wonder how it has come to be used so frequently in newspapers like the New York Times.
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 02:35 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:
One might then wonder how it has come to be used so frequently in newspapers like the New York Times.


Are you being disingenuous? That is an American paper! Their style guide probably says that "Sho' nuff" is excessively formal.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2014 03:33 pm
@contrex,
Smile Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 06:17:04