The Universe Explained In Under 3 Minutes.

Explanations of the universe, energy, conservation principles, etc., by non-physicists, with no math are baloney. People who publish their physics first on YouTube have a bad track record. Please provide me with a link to the peer reviewed physics journal this appeared in.

Bran no offense but I'd incline to side with Que. Some of Einstein's early insights have been described as philosophical observations

Bran no offense but I'd incline to side with Que. Some of Einstein's early insights have been described as philosophical observations

Doesn't this look like physics and math?

Quote:

Doesn't this look like physics and math?

Thanks Bran for that link. I was thinking more of his earlier ruminations:

For Einstein, insight did not come from logic or mathematics. It came, as it does for artists, from intuition and inspiration.

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/imagine/201003/einstein-creative-thinking-music-and-the-intuitive-art-scientific-imagination

He may have gotten a few suspicions that way, but the actual theory is done with physics and math, isn't it? People who publish non-mathematical cosmology on YouTube instead of in peer reviewed journals will never be correct.

Why would any sensible person exchange posts with the above poster? Do you really need to enable him? Certainly no good can come from an exchange with him.

The hallmark of crackpot physics by untrained people is that it lacks any math or reference to actual physics except at a minimal layman's level.

How can anyone 'explain' the universe in under three minutes, when getting the math to understand things like Lorentz manifolds, de Sitter space, Minkowski space etc would take considerably longer?

those 'spaces' arent really that important. You see, the theories of Einstein ( Lorentz etc) is obsolete. It doesn't wotk.
See the other thread about Einsteins nonsense.

The nonsense is coming from you.