@Quehoniaomath,
Well, true, an Ice Age IS Ccoming, but not for another twenty or thirty thousand years.
The ice ages are due to regular changes in the earth's orbit. n They're called Milankovich Cycles, and they're not due in either of our lifetimes.
But you, quahog, don't know anything about that. What your supposed expert was talking about, as you would know if you had any knowledge at all, which you clearly don't (and that includes reading comprehension, obviously). was what he claimed was a 30 YEAR CYCLE IUN THE SUN'S OUTPUT WHICH WOULD LEAD TO A
MINI ICE AGE, like the Maunder Minimum of three centuries ago, which is something entirely different from a full-blown ice age, and far, far less drastic. Of course, based on the observed outcomes of his own predictions, we're not going to get that either.
Now other climate denialists regard your expert as a "scam artist" (their words) because basically he's trying to gin up sales of his own self-published books (apparently no reputable publisher would touch them). His credentials show a whole lot of resume inflaion.
He formulated his alleged solar cycle (which no one else who studies solar cycles confirms) back in 2007. He claimed the cooling effects would begin to be apparent within three years, and would be totally obvious by 2012. In fact, 2010, three years after, was at the time tied with 2005 for the warmest years on record. Now 2014, without the added kick of an el Nino, which your favorite year 1997 had, is the warmest year on record. So basically by his own predictions, he's WRONG.
Get over it, Quahog, no, we aren't going to be freezing anytime soon, unless you plan on living twenty thousand more years. You can find all kinds of loonies posting crap on the internet. Try to find someone with a tad more credibility next time. (I know you won't, you'll just find some other outlier with some other nutball hypothesis).
