By the way, there was an article in the New York Times yesterday that may be of interest to some of you Tony-mongers. The article was written by Daniel Okrent, the "Public Editor" of the Times (a position that was created after the Jayson Blair controversy, to serve as a kind of in-house critic of the Times and its policies and practices).
In the article, Okrent blasts the Times for the amount of coverage it gives to the Tony awards, calling them "an artistically meaningless, blatantly commercial, shamefully exclusionary and culturally corrosive award competition" (whew!) Essentially, his point is that, because the Tony awards are restricted to shows that are produced in Broadway theaters (not off-Broadway or off-off), they leave out much of the good theater that's done in New York, and serve the interests of the "Big Three" organizations that control the Broadway houses.
Here's a link to the article (which will be good for a week), for anyone who wants to read the whole thing:
There's No Business Like Tony Awards Business