0
   

Jeb's agenda or Right of Privacy?

 
 
Reply Fri 7 May, 2004 07:34 am
A law pushed through by Gov Jeb Bush o keep a severely brain-damaged woman alive was struck down by Florida Circuit Judge Douglas Baird thursday. Judge Baird ruled that the law is unconstitutional because it violates the disabled woman's right to privacy and delegates legislative power to the govenor.
The Govenor's office filed an immediate appeal.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,072 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 May, 2004 07:36 am
http://www.tampatrib.com/MGA3IV0SXTD.html

Quote:
Gov. Jeb Bush and the Legislature violated at least four provisions of the Florida Constitution when they took action last year to prevent the death of Terri Schiavo, a judge ruled Thursday.


This entire thing is out of control. Jeb Bush is using his clout to pacify the religious right.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 7 May, 2004 02:47 pm
Phoenix32890 wrote:
http://www.tampatrib.com/MGA3IV0SXTD.html

Quote:
Gov. Jeb Bush and the Legislature violated at least four provisions of the Florida Constitution when they took action last year to prevent the death of Terri Schiavo, a judge ruled Thursday.


This entire thing is out of control. Jeb Bush is using his clout to pacify the religious right.


I thought it was Jeb's legal obligation to take this position!
0 Replies
 
Portal Star
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 01:09 pm
Re: Jeb's agenda or Right of Privacy?
dyslexia wrote:
A law pushed through by Gov Jeb Bush o keep a severely brain-damaged woman alive was struck down by Florida Circuit Judge Douglas Baird thursday. Judge Baird ruled that the law is unconstitutional because it violates the disabled woman's right to privacy and delegates legislative power to the govenor.
The Govenor's office filed an immediate appeal.



Let me get this straight... Jeb going into people's bedrooms/hospital rooms and telling them that they are not allowed to terminate their lives ... This somehow protects their right to privacy?

Funny how an overarching beaurocratic government can word things to say the opposite of what they really mean. Like how the "patriot act" is nearly the exact opposite of what our founders would call patriotism. Intrusive government interference into the private lives of civillians is also somehow worded as "privacy."

I have never understood the Christian right's insistance on requiring people who will never get out of a coma to be hooked onto an EXPENSIVE machine and not allowed to die naturally - even against the will of their own loved ones. Talk about sick animated corpse. If I am ever a vegetable, I don't want my family to be legally forced into paying doctors to pump vitals through my dead flesh.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 01:26 pm
Miller- The whole issue is between Terri's husband and her parents. He wants to pull the plug, stating that Terri would never want to live like she is. Her folks think that with treatment, she will improve, which, IMO, is a pipe dream. Jeb Bush had absolutely no business sticking his nose into what is a private matter.

Do you know what the upshot of this case is in Florida? The hospitals bug you to make sure that you have a copy of a Living Will in your hospital records. Lawyers advertise all over the place about Living Wills and Health Care Proxies.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 01:27 pm
Here here, Portal Star. I completely agree. This is just another grab at trying to erase our freedoms as human beings. Yes, doctors do make an obligation to preserve life as long as possible, but at some point, with terminal cases, I don't see the logic in holding on.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 01:28 pm
Erm, and to reiterate what Phoenix addressed to Miller, it is certainly not Jeb's legal right to do this.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 10:06 pm
Who is the patient's court-appointed guardian?
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 8 May, 2004 10:08 pm
cavfancier wrote:
Erm, and to reiterate what Phoenix addressed to Miller, it is certainly not Jeb's legal right to do this.


I heard on the radio that Jeb had the legal obligation to do this. I figured it must be a Florida law to protect the patient's rights.
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 May, 2004 02:55 pm
A judge recently over-ruled the one time(as Jeb calls it) Terri law, and, of course, the guv will appeal. I don't know of one state that allows a governor to make a law. That's the domain of the legislature.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Jeb's agenda or Right of Privacy?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 05/01/2025 at 11:46:24