John Webb wrote:Members of the armed forces who lay down their lives for the enrichment of George and his buddies, rather than the defense of America, cannot be described as smart.
As reported elsewhere and as William Broyles Jr. wrote:
"If this war is truly worth fighting, then the burdens of doing so should fall on all Americans. If you support this war, but assume that Pat Tillman and Other People's Children should fight it, then you are worse than a hypocrite. If it's not worth your family fighting it, then it's not worth it, period. The draft is the truest test of public support for the administration's handling of the war, which is perhaps why the administration is so dead set against bringing it back."
You can't really be serious. Personally I support the war and ANYONE who goes over there to fight and as I said earlier, I didn't see Clinton shoving Chelsea into a blackhawk helicopter to go over to Kosovo.
Just because the children of politicians are not members of the military, does not mean that the President (he is the commander in cheif and the head of the military) should not be allowed to send the people who signed up off to war. Regardless of how you feel about the war, calling soldiers dimwits is not only irresponsible, it is an outrage to me and probably anyone else who has served in the military.
Like it or not, when you sign on the dotted line, you know there is a chance that you could be called off to go and fight for your country. You might die. Pat Tillman, and our local boys and girls may have died in vain in your opinion, but that does not mean that they don't deserve your respect.
Tell me you wouldn't get upset if I started posting that people that do your job are dimwits..