1
   

Proof that the Iraqis like US soldiers

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 May, 2004 03:20 pm
Seems to me, however, Tarantulas, that at first you preferred the "thumbs up" to be the original - or wha did you start and call this thread "Proof that the Iraquis like US soldiers"?

(Obviously you didn't know that the pic(s) is (are) one year old.)
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 May, 2004 10:51 pm
My thread title was an intentional bit of misdirection to catch people's reactions to Iraqi kids holding a pro-Bush sign. The response was not disappointing.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 May, 2004 10:57 pm
I'm glad you are mature enough to be satisfied that your little falsehood was exposed.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 May, 2004 11:15 pm
I exposed it myself about halfway through the thread.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 May, 2004 11:19 pm
I thought it was clever, Tarantulas.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 01:30 am
Well thank you! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 06:52 am
As did I.
0 Replies
 
fairandbalanced
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 07:12 am
Laughing
Those kids looks like they were paid food or money to hold up that sign. Laughing That sign was obviously not written by those kids. It looks like that soldier wrote it himself. How corny are those thumbs up signs. That soldier reminds me of the soldiers holding a thumbs up near the naked bodies of Iraqi POWs. Disturbing to say the least.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 07:17 am
Yes. As craven pointed out, the original story is deeply disheartening (given its accuracy). Particularly so because this could have been almost a Norman Rockwell moment of shared humanity. The present context of the cases where American and Brit militaries have (allegedly) committed deeply degrading indignities on Iraqis doesn't help.
0 Replies
 
Deecups36
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 07:19 am
It's highly unlikely those cute little kidlets wrote that sign. This is Tokyo Rose-styled propaganda.

Shame on tarantulas for posting it and aiding and abetting the US military in exploiting children.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 07:23 am
Given that tarantulas did expose it himself, and I'll take his word that he initially intended to do so, then I don't find the posting offensive. In fact, it's a fun thing in and of itself (I tried to post a version, but failed, where the sign would have read, "This is the size of craven's weenie.")

You might take tarantulas to task for other posts (please do), but not this one I think.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 07:31 am
Tarantulas wrote:
I exposed it myself about halfway through the thread.


Ah, I must agree with kickycan on how clever you are. Generally, one must go to the collective works of Pee Wee Herman for the old "I meant to do that strategy". A classic, an outright clinic for clever response.
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 11:02 am
Such things are not unusual. During GW I the "thing to do" was to pose dead Iraqis in simulated sex positions, or to take snaps of them with cigarettes in their mouths. Confused
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 11:27 am
Whether you like it or not, soldiers do bad things sometimes. They are hired killers, for christ's sake! Does anyone really expect them all to be sensitive Oprah types? A lot of them are young and not so bright. When you train young, not so bright people to kill other young, not so bright people, there are inevitably going to be a lot of shocking stupid actions.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 11:44 am
kicky, It's not that they are not "bright people." Wars bring out the worst in humans. Many university research shows how any average joe (with relatively high intelligence) can be turned into a sadistic individual.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 12:00 pm
Well, I agree: such happens and happened.
(The Geneva convention, btw, is taught within the first weeks on any German consript and professional soldier.)

As an -not really- aside, this true story [= confirmed by USArmy, published (partly) in (local] history magazines]:

two days after my parents got married (28.03.45), the US troops closed the 'Ruhrkessel' (Battle of the Ruhr) exactly in my hometown.

My father, a surgeon lieutenant, didn't hear to my grandfather ("Bury the uniform in the garden - you are still officially a student"), but painted red crosses on the local hospital, organized white clothes and convinced the former mayor, went to the former mayor's hidden place (because this one was a Jew) and asked him to join the him [father thought, he was the highest rank in town] passing a letter of surrender to the allied troops.

While doing such, they shot at him three times at different places, the last time, when he had 'hand-up'. (Remember: my father was wearing a surgeon's uniform and unarmed.)

Three days later [the battle of the ruhr was still going on, , he and half a douzen more soldiers with non-combatant status were carried in valley near a close-by village: the US-soldiers made something, which had a distant likeness to a trial. Then, they gave the Germans a spade, and they had to dig a hole, as long as a man and more than a meter deep.
After that, each of them was ordered to stand in fronnt of that whole, maschine guns were brought into position ..... and all Americans started to laugh.
The next day, my father was deported to France and returned in 1948.

However, this soon circled around Germans ... and since there were German speaking American troops, around Americans as well.
As far as I could find out, all these soldiers were send back to the front, to suicide squad.

The HQ's of a bataillon were in our house. My mother, a volunteer nurse, got a personal guards 24/24, every morning, she got "anonymous" a big rucksack with cigarettes, chocolates etc for the hospital, all antiques, paintings, books etc, which had been "confiscated" from grandparents, relatives and my parents in our house, where given back within hours.


My father acted 35 years as (part-time) county surgeon in that village's county. He never ever went there, even if he should.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 02:07 pm
Yes, Walter, that is the way it is.

Unfortunately, the failure to brief these soldiers beforehand on the Geneva Convention rules (and on local Muslim values and customs) plays into the hands of those who would portray ALL Americans in this way. Stupid stupid stupid.
0 Replies
 
Tarantulas
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 May, 2004 10:32 pm
Quote:
LCPL Boudreaux's mom?

A visitor claiming to be LCPL Boudreaux's mom has posted comments in this Graphictruth.com thread.

Quote:
All of you are wrong about this young man. The picture has been altered. This young marine wound give his life for any of you; even those that wish him harm. He would stop a bullet for anyone and because some fool altered the picture and thought it was funny the rest of his life will be awful. His family lives in fear every minute now because of the negative comments on the internet. They all stand behind him because they know he would not have done anything to hurt his God, his nation or his family. Back off; you've hurt him enough.

The Proud Mother of a very special Marine: LCPL Ted J. Boudreaux Jr.


Another user dismissed this comment as "coming from Freepland," and I can't say that I blame him/her. I would be skeptical too.

But upon being challenged, the name she gave checks out in this Houma Courier (Louisiana) article, as does the email address she gives at this Houma, Louisiana company.

The Houma Courier article is pretty interesting. In it, we find yet another claim about what the sign said in the original photo:


Quote:
They were not the original. The original was in a group of photos he sent in the e-mail," Gustafson said. "It said 'Welcome Marines' or something like that. There was not anything unusual or offensive.


And for the first time that I'm aware of, LCPL Boudreaux speaks:

Quote:
Now working in retail, Boudreaux was reached by telephone Tuesday and confirmed his mother's account of the photo, but would not discuss it in detail.

"There is nothing really I can say," Boudreaux said. "I will stand back and wait and hopefully let everything work itself out."

The reservist did say the original photo was taken in the town of Al Kut, and he spoke of the many children his reserve unit made contact with while there.

"Plenty of times little kids would come up to us, we would be out in town or on patrol," Boudreaux said. "We had (military "Meals Ready to Eat") and Skittles and Starbursts and we would hand them out to the little kids."


Finally, it seems like Boudreaux just can't catch a break. When his mom said he would stop a bullet for anyone, she wasn't kidding:

Quote:
In August 2001 Boudreaux was kidnapped and shot during a carjacking at the Southland Mall.

He and a companion, Jason Kaylor, were approached by a Jefferson Parish man, Dominic Robinson, who brandished a gun and demanded Kaylor's customized Nissan Stanza.

Boudreaux was wounded during an ensuing struggle, after which Robinson drove the car to the Mississippi state line and released him.


Link
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 May, 2004 07:39 am
I have never had any formal training in the Geneva convention either, yet I still know what is right and what is wrong. To use that as an excuse is sad.

When I first saw the pictures, I thought they looked fake. No designations anywhere, no faces on the "prisoners" and no insignia on the GI shirts...I thought it was rather "convenient" for the left to have these pictures show up. Now I am just saddened by the sheer idiocy of some people...
0 Replies
 
infowarrior
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 May, 2004 07:44 am
"When I first saw the pictures, I thought they looked fake." McGentrix

<sigh> Is this what Rush and Fox News is telling the lemmings to repeat regarding the torture photos?

"I thought it was rather "convenient" for the left to have these pictures show up." McGentrix

The 'left?' Ah, the photos came from a British journalist in Iraq -- not an operative from the DNC or Kerry camp. Not everything negative about Bush's Iraq war is part of a vast let wing conspiracy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 10:05:13