1
   

content

 
 
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 10:08 am
One reason Comcast is viewed as attractive these days is its rapidly growing high-speed Internet business, which has been prospering as dial-up lines - the business that AOL dominated - have begun to lose market share. High-speed Internet supplied $2.3 billion of revenue for Comcast in 2003, up 52 percent from 2002.

By contrast, content - the stuff that media customers actually see - is a very small part of Comcast now. It offers cable channels like the E! Entertainment and Style networks and the Golf Channel, but total revenue from that segment came to just $885 million.

------------------------------
What does "content" mean here? content = the stuff? It seems weird to me. Razz

--------------------------
Flash 4 offers exciting new features for creating immersive, lush interactive web sites.

Immersive? What is immersive?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 618 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 10:44 am
The article might help explain what is content:

Disney Deal Suggests Content Is No Longer King
By FLOYD NORRIS

Published: February 12, 2004

It would be the largest media company in America, created after a highly valued company with little involvement in media content sought to buy a media company that was larger, but not nearly as loved by Wall Street.

That is one way to look at Comcast's offer to buy Disney in an all-stock transaction.

The combined company, with almost $47 billion in annual revenue, would surpass Time Warner Inc. as the No. 1 media conglomerate. Time Warner's revenue last year was $39.6 billion.

===================================
Another article:

Disney is a content giant, with its movie studios as well as ABC Television and ESPN. A few years ago, Wall Street leaned toward the view that content would be king in the new media world, and Disney was a very hot stock.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 11:05 am
Content could be alleged to be a victim of language abuse. Within the last ten years or so, content has been used as a noun to describe the product which a medium presents to the customer--that is, to the reader or viewer. It is used properly here, but it is a usage of which i am contemptuous.

In the culture of large corporations, the creation of new terms for old ideas is a common activity. An executive in a corporation will attempt to justify their large salary by a large output of documents which seem to show that the executive concerned is working very hard. In order to make largely meaningless letters and memoranda look more thoughtfully composed, the author will often resort to neologisms to suggest that their ideas are "new and now." The word content as it is used here has a marginal claim to validity in that content can refer to printed works, video productions, audio productions--which is to say it is a term used to describe a great many things which do not otherwise easily fit into a common category. The trouble with such neologisms is that they often become meaningless. I think this has happened with this use of the word content.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Apr, 2004 11:20 am
Hehe, they are just playing "dirty tricks" to boom their achievements?

Thanks Set.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
  1. Forums
  2. » content
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 04:51:45