Grammar

Yes, it's fine.

Agree with S. above. However I note here no quick verb def and wonder why

http://onelook.com/?w=steward&ls=a

You are wrong but your crappy links, when adroitly used, can lead to the proper answer:

Thanks to Tim for Proper Answer and my most abject apologies to all whom my postings offend

Adroit use of crappy links strongly encouraged

No, I don't encourage the use of such links.

If one wants to offer help in these matters, then he should provide a simple and direct link to the topic at hand.

They are not so scarce as to need the use of multi-clickable crappy links.

Again Tim thank you for such helpful input; but briefly I wonder how one goes about determining whether or not a link is crappy

If you're referring to the OneLook "steward" link my object was a sort of indirect inquiry into the reason its verb form wasn't included among the listing of common usages. One possibility, as you infer, is crappy work on he part of its compiler. However, since almost any noun can be used as a verb it's also possible, eg, minimization of page size, that such a form is omitted except in cases where such usage has proven rare

But thank you for your input, stimulating as it does further speculation into subjects to your Average Clod (me) seemingly otherwise circuitous or variegated

When you offer a link that you have to click more than once to get the answer is a crappy link.

A link that shows more letters than the answer is a crappy link.

But I firmly believe that your incipient Alzheimer will make you forget this in five minutes.

Thank you Tim, I certainly do hope so