9
   

Grammatically correct?

 
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 04:39 pm
@dalehileman,
A person was say that nothing [in his field] is impossible to him.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 04:41 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Yes, it's grammatical.

Fast is nothing.

Delicious is nothing.

Big is nothing.




I cannot say that your sentences are correct.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 04:47 pm
@Advocate,
What is there to explain, A? Things do not have to make sense to be
grammatical.

Colourless green ideas sleep furiously.

is an example (Chomsky) of a nonsense sentence that is fully grammatical.

Any part of speech can be the subject of a sentence.

Quickly is an adverb.

A is an article.

On functions as a preposition.

Impossible is a piece of cake.

JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 04:49 pm
@Advocate,
That one is definitely not grammatical, A.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 11:04 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

What is there to explain, A? Things do not have to make sense to be
grammatical.

Colourless green ideas sleep furiously.

is an example (Chomsky) of a nonsense sentence that is fully grammatical.

Any part of speech can be the subject of a sentence.

Quickly is an adverb.

A is an article.

On functions as a preposition.

Impossible is a piece of cake.




The last sentence is questionable. You are being cute re the others.
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 05:08 am
@Advocate,

Quote:
I cannot say that your sentences are correct.


Nor indeed can I.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:32 am
@McTag,
That's because you both know little of language.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:33 am
@JTT,
Thanks for not bringing up US-war crimes.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:35 am
@Advocate,
The last sentence is fine, A.

I've not often heard grammar instruction described as "cute" .
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 11:57 am
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

The last sentence is fine, A.

I've not often heard grammar instruction described as "cute" .


Read "cute" as meaning "sleazy."
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:37 pm
@Advocate,
Again, that's illustrative of how little you know of language, A.

You can describe it any way you want, with any adjective you want.

Language must be able to cover all situations.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:40 pm
@Advocate,
Have you heard of the criminal things Americans have done to the English language ?

Smile
dalehileman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 12:48 pm
@JTT,
JTT I have to agree that it's going to hell. Someone might consider a new thread soliciting examples

One immediately coming to mind is calling a block of semiconductor mat'l a "drive"
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Jan, 2014 01:01 pm
@dalehileman,
You're confusing natural language change with the nonsense you were taught as a young man, Dale - the bs that came from the Strunk & white generation and before.

There are lots of threads already with lots of these language lunacies.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 04/28/2024 at 07:54:06