Journals only surpress articles for a few reasons.
1They dont add anything to understandings of the science
2They are flat wrong or out of date (your case)
3They are a politically biased or religiously based argument on behalf of that belief
Anything that puts up a really good argument and data and evidence for a POV that counters science of the day, is usually welcomed for a mere reason that it SELLS. (Journals are, really, a business model, not Vespers
I did make a point, and it is quite valid
. Then why does recent data(12 years post your reference??) show that the Sierras ARE cumulatively losing snowpack AND ,all the .