@farmerman,
Quote:Your entire worldview is based on life being too complex to have been arrived at by its own devices.
Not that I agree with you about what my world view is based on, but you dismiss complexity too breezily.
I mean, at what level do you say - WTF,
that is no accident. If I follow your way of thinking, I must ignore not only common sense but mathematics. And yes, you can point to Quantum Mechanics which would say anything is possible (given enough time), it would say that if I waited long enough this computer would assemble itself from rocks but you know that argument is one that nobody would buy. But you claim that approach works with evolution and people buy it. Amazing.
I've already conceeded defeat on whether it was possible to convince a knowledgable person who embraced Neo Evolution and its precursor
Abiogenesis, that it was flawed using only scientific arguments.
What surprised me was how difficult it was to concentrate the arguments on objective grounds. It's like an analog of Dark Energy which repels the two sides of the argument or quantum particles that can't be looked at without changing the argument to something else.
The only unanswered question is what accounts for this.