Your religious view is not offensive. Do not try to become Leadfoot and misrepresent what others say. I am a totlly committed advocate of free speech and religious preference. I AM NOT a passive supporter of the fraudulent views of th religious aspects of Creationism (The part that they assert is that Creation Science is science at all), AND ID, which describes itself as non religious based but uses only the arguments that are associated with fundamental religions.
The latest tricks are how the IDers will take a fact from biology , like chromatids that are nuclear bodies mde of DNA/RNA and argenine and lysine bodies called histones , the structure and functions weve known for quite a while, but now, with the revealing of possible neo Lmarkian funtion, IDers are touting this as "the end of Evolution" as it , like soft tissue in dinodaurs , MUST be representative of an intelligence in charge. THATS THE ENTIRE BASIS OF THE ID STYLE OF ANALYSIS, (ie, "it complx so it MUST be designed).
The IDers in chrge of writing their case, hve failed to bring up the point that histons and chromatids in general hve apparently evolved through the simples of life like archea (where histones and chhromatids dont exist becuse prokaryotes dont have nucleii (home of your entire genome slapped together by chromatids and held like a book. The There are about 5 different flavors of Chromtids , each apparently showing some evolutionary change.
YET, even now, we are trying to understnd how epigenesis and genes and chromatids and pH /Eh all fit together vi scientific experimenttion.
HOWVER, the IDers from the Discovery Institute have created a "magic bus" of xplanation with a BS assertion that histones mean Intelligence.
Ya See BJ, I dont want kids being taught religious BULLSHIT that is making believe its based on science when the authors of the ID movement have been consistently fraudulent and quick to "make up a story" when the reserch iwnt even fully in(nd what there is DOES NOT support ID as LF and you frequently confess and believe)
By our Contitution, You are free to believe in whatever you need to make your life meaningful, and I support your right at the top of my voice. However,If you wish to teach biology in a PUBLIC CHOOL just make sure that its all fact based and tested somewhat and is not a quick assertion revolving around your above mentioned faith. THAT is forbidden "Teach"-speech in PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Apparently youre too dense to understand that simple point derived from Amendment 1
Your analysis of our Constitution and your views about the Dover decision are really laughable because you dont really challenge the basis of the issue, you speak mostly in irrelevant asides about sub-atomic particles, and most lately irrelevant philosophy ,just to hide a degree of ignorance about the issues at hand, denial of evolution as a fact based science.
SO, I dont think we have anything else to discuss. Youre really not here to do anything but promote ID without any relevant evidence. Im tired of your defensive asides and inabilities to compile any good evidence based arguments and , instead, blame ME for being the fatuous one, and claiming that Im the one who is avoiding discussing "issues " with you.
You know that is BS and youre just unarmed . even your discussions about DOVER have been silly stuff that youve mostly pulled out of your ass.
The only other person Ive said this to Is gungasnake, but BJ, "youve no idea in hell about what youre talking about"